Myocarditis
The diagnosis requires high clinical suspicion, particularly in young patients presenting with cardiac symptoms following viral illness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as the gold standard...
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Urgent signals
Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.
- Chest pain in young patient with recent viral illness
- New heart failure symptoms
- Ventricular arrhythmias or high-grade AV block
- Elevated troponin with normal coronary arteries
Linked comparisons
Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Pericarditis
Editorial and exam context
Reviewed by MedVellum Editorial Team · MedVellum Medical Education Platform
Credentials: MBBS, MRCP, Board Certified
Topic family
This concept exists in multiple MedVellum libraries. Use the primary page for the broadest reference view and the others for exam-specific framing.
The diagnosis requires high clinical suspicion, particularly in young patients presenting with cardiac symptoms following viral illness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as the gold standard...
1. Fulminant myocarditis (rapid onset below 2 weeks, severe LV dysfunction EF below 35%, cardiogenic shock) has better l... CICM Second Part exam preparation.
Myocarditis
Topic Overview
Summary
Myocarditis is inflammation of the myocardium with a heterogeneous spectrum of clinical presentations ranging from subclinical disease to fulminant heart failure and sudden cardiac death. The condition is most commonly caused by viral infections, though autoimmune disorders, toxins, and drugs are increasingly recognized etiologies. Clinical presentation varies from mild chest discomfort to acute heart failure, life-threatening arrhythmias, or cardiogenic shock. [1]
The diagnosis requires high clinical suspicion, particularly in young patients presenting with cardiac symptoms following viral illness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as the gold standard non-invasive diagnostic tool, using the Lake Louise criteria to identify myocardial inflammation and injury. [2,3] Endomyocardial biopsy remains the histological gold standard but is reserved for specific clinical scenarios due to its invasive nature and sampling error limitations. [4]
Management is primarily supportive, focusing on heart failure treatment and arrhythmia control. Immunosuppressive therapy is reserved for specific histological subtypes such as giant cell myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis. [5] Prognosis is variable: most patients recover completely, but 10-25% progress to dilated cardiomyopathy requiring long-term management or transplantation. [6,7] Paradoxically, fulminant myocarditis—despite its acute severity—has better long-term outcomes than acute non-fulminant disease if patients survive the initial presentation. [8]
Key Facts
- Incidence: 22 per 100,000 person-years (likely underestimated due to subclinical cases) [9]
- Causes: Viral (60-70%), autoimmune (15-20%), drug-induced (5-10%), idiopathic (15-20%) [1,10]
- Peak Age: Bimodal—young adults (20-40 years) and infants
- Male Predominance: Male-to-female ratio approximately 1.5-1.7:1 [11]
- Presentation Triad: Chest pain + heart failure symptoms + arrhythmias (classic but not always complete)
- ECG Findings: Diffuse ST elevation (40-50%), PR depression, T wave inversion, arrhythmias [12]
- Troponin: Elevated in 50-75% of cases [13]
- CMR Sensitivity: 75-85% using updated Lake Louise criteria [2,3]
- Mortality: 1-7% in-hospital; fulminant myocarditis 40-50% without mechanical support [8,14]
- Long-term DCM: 10-25% develop dilated cardiomyopathy [6,7]
Clinical Pearls
Young patient with chest pain + elevated troponin + recent viral illness = myocarditis until proven otherwise. Do NOT assume acute coronary syndrome without considering this diagnosis.
ECG in myocarditis shows diffuse (not regional) ST elevation without reciprocal changes—unlike STEMI which shows regional changes with reciprocal ST depression.
Cardiac MRI is the non-invasive gold standard. The updated Lake Louise criteria require both T1-based and T2-based abnormalities for diagnosis. [2,3]
Fulminant myocarditis presents with cardiogenic shock but has BETTER long-term prognosis than acute non-fulminant disease if the patient survives the acute phase. [8]
Avoid NSAIDs in acute myocarditis—animal studies suggest increased mortality and myocardial damage, though human data is limited. [15]
Activity restriction for 3-6 months is critical—return to competitive sport has been associated with sudden cardiac death during the inflammatory phase. [16]
Why This Matters Clinically
Myocarditis represents a critical diagnostic challenge with significant implications:
- Diagnostic Mimicry: Can present identically to acute MI, leading to unnecessary coronary intervention or missed diagnoses
- Sudden Death Risk: Leading cause of sudden cardiac death in young athletes and military recruits [17]
- Long-term Sequelae: Major cause of "idiopathic" dilated cardiomyopathy and heart transplantation in younger patients [18]
- Public Health: Increasing recognition of vaccine-associated myocarditis (particularly mRNA COVID-19 vaccines) requires balanced risk-benefit counseling [19]
- Treatment Implications: Unlike MI, most myocarditis is managed supportively without revascularization; immunosuppression may harm if used inappropriately [5,20]
Visual Summary
Visual assets to be added:
- ECG comparison: STEMI vs myocarditis (regional vs diffuse ST elevation)
- Cardiac MRI T2 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement patterns
- Myocarditis etiology flowchart (viral, autoimmune, drug-induced, idiopathic)
- Management algorithm by presentation severity
- Histopathology: Dallas criteria vs immunohistochemistry
- Fulminant vs non-fulminant clinical course comparison
- Lake Louise criteria visual summary
Epidemiology
Incidence and Prevalence
True Incidence Unknown: The reported incidence of 22 per 100,000 person-years significantly underestimates true disease burden due to:
- Subclinical cases never diagnosed (estimated 10-20 fold higher actual incidence) [9]
- Misdiagnosis as "viral syndrome" or "idiopathic chest pain"
- Attribution to other causes in sudden death cases
- Geographic and temporal variation with viral epidemics
Autopsy Studies: Myocarditis found in 1-9% of routine autopsies, rising to 12-20% in young sudden death cases [17,21]
Clinical Cohorts: Among patients with unexplained new-onset heart failure, biopsy-proven myocarditis found in 9-16% [22]
Demographics
Age Distribution:
- Bimodal peak: young adults (20-40 years) and infants/children under 5 years
- Median age at presentation: 33-42 years across large registries [11,23]
- Pediatric myocarditis more commonly fulminant (40-50% vs 15-20% in adults) [24]
Sex Differences:
- Male predominance: 1.5-1.7:1 male-to-female ratio [11]
- Males more likely to present with severe phenotypes
- Possible explanations: hormonal protection in females, testosterone-mediated immune responses, higher male viral susceptibility
Geographic Variation:
- Higher in developed countries (better diagnostic capability)
- Seasonal variation follows viral epidemics (enterovirus peak in late summer/fall)
- Chagas disease endemic regions (Latin America): major cause of myocarditis
Etiological Causes
Infectious Causes (60-70% of cases)
Viral (Most Common): [1,10,25]
| Virus Family | Specific Viruses | Clinical Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Enteroviruses | Coxsackie B (most common historical), Echovirus | Classic viral myocarditis; declining incidence |
| Adenovirus | Multiple serotypes | More common in children and immunocompromised |
| Parvovirus B19 | Increasingly recognized; detected in 20-30% of EMB in Europe [26] | |
| Human Herpesvirus 6 | HHV-6 | Associated with chronic/persistent myocarditis [27] |
| Influenza | Influenza A and B | Myocarditis complicates severe influenza; H1N1 notable |
| SARS-CoV-2 | COVID-19 | Acute myocarditis during infection; vaccine-associated cases [19,28] |
| HIV | Direct myocardial invasion; DDx includes drug toxicity | |
| Hepatitis C | Associated with cardiomyopathy | |
| Epstein-Barr | EBV | Rare cause |
Bacterial:
- Corynebacterium diphtheriae: Historical significance; toxin-mediated
- Borrelia burgdorferi: Lyme carditis—presents with AV block
- Streptococcus, Staphylococcus: Direct invasion or toxin-mediated
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Rare complication
Parasitic:
- Trypanosoma cruzi: Chagas disease—major cause in Latin America; chronic phase leads to dilated cardiomyopathy
- Toxoplasmosis: In immunocompromised patients
Fungal: Rare; typically immunocompromised (Aspergillus, Candida)
Non-Infectious Causes (30-40%)
Autoimmune and Systemic Inflammatory (15-20%): [29]
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Myocarditis in 8-25% of SLE patients
- Systemic Sclerosis: Cardiac involvement in 15-35%
- Dermatomyositis/Polymyositis: Myocardial inflammation common
- Sarcoidosis: Cardiac involvement in 25-30% (often subclinical); granulomatous inflammation [30]
- Giant Cell Myocarditis: Rapidly progressive; high mortality without immunosuppression [31]
- Eosinophilic Myocarditis: Associated with hypereosinophilic syndrome, Churg-Strauss
- Kawasaki Disease: Pediatric; coronary aneurysms + myocarditis
Drug-Induced (5-10%): [32]
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Nivolumab, pembrolizumab—severe fulminant myocarditis in 0.1-1% [33]
- Anthracyclines: Doxorubicin, daunorubicin—dose-dependent cardiotoxicity
- Clozapine: 0.7-1.2% incidence; typically in first month of therapy [34]
- Cocaine: Direct toxicity + coronary vasospasm
- Amphetamines: Methamphetamine, MDMA
- Smallpox Vaccine: Historical; 1 in 10,000-30,000 vaccinees
- mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines: Predominantly young males; incidence 1-5 per 100,000, mostly mild [19]
Toxic:
- Alcohol (may overlap with dilated cardiomyopathy)
- Heavy metals (copper, iron, lead)
- Carbon monoxide
Idiopathic (15-20%): No cause identified despite thorough evaluation
Pathophysiology
Three-Phase Model of Viral Myocarditis
Viral myocarditis follows a triphasic course from initial infection to either recovery or chronic cardiomyopathy: [35]
Phase 1: Viral Entry and Direct Injury (Days 1-7)
Mechanism:
- Viral Binding: Viruses (especially enteroviruses) bind to the coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR) on cardiomyocyte surface
- Cellular Entry: Viral internalization and replication within myocytes
- Direct Cytopathic Effect: Viral replication causes myocyte necrosis and apoptosis
- Protease Activation: Viral proteases cleave dystrophin and other cytoskeletal proteins, disrupting cellular architecture [36]
Clinical Correlate: Viral prodrome—fever, myalgia, upper respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms
Phase 2: Immune Activation (Days 7-14)
Innate Immunity:
- Pattern recognition receptors (TLRs) detect viral PAMPs
- Activation of interferon pathways and cytokine release (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α)
- Natural killer cell recruitment
- Complement activation
Adaptive Immunity:
- Antigen presentation activates CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
- Cytotoxic T lymphocytes attack infected and uninfected myocytes (molecular mimicry)
- Autoantibody production against cardiac antigens (myosin, troponin, β1-adrenergic receptor) [37]
- B cell activation and antibody-mediated injury
Myocardial Damage:
- Inflammatory infiltrate (lymphocytes, macrophages, eosinophils depending on etiology)
- Myocyte necrosis and apoptosis from immune attack
- Interstitial edema
- Microvascular dysfunction
Clinical Correlate: Cardiac symptoms emerge—chest pain, dyspnea, arrhythmias; troponin elevation; ECG changes
Phase 3: Resolution or Progression (Weeks to Months)
Three possible outcomes:
A. Complete Resolution (60-70%):
- Viral clearance
- Downregulation of immune response
- Myocardial healing with minimal fibrosis
- Return of normal cardiac function
B. Chronic Persistent Myocarditis (10-15%):
- Failure to clear viral genome (persistent low-level viral presence detected by PCR) [26,27]
- Ongoing low-grade inflammation
- Progressive fibrosis
- Gradual transition to dilated cardiomyopathy
- Chronic heart failure symptoms
C. Dilated Cardiomyopathy (10-25%):
- Extensive myocardial damage and fibrosis
- Ventricular remodeling and dilatation
- Persistent systolic dysfunction
- Clinical heart failure requiring long-term management [6,7]
Molecular Mechanisms
Genetic Susceptibility:
- HLA-DQ and HLA-DR alleles associated with increased susceptibility and worse outcomes [38]
- Polymorphisms in cytokine genes (TNF-α, IL-10) influence disease severity
- Dystrophin mutations may predispose to viral entry
Autoimmune Perpetuation:
- Molecular mimicry: viral antigens share epitopes with cardiac proteins [37]
- Epitope spreading: immune response expands to additional cardiac antigens
- Autoantibodies to β1-adrenergic receptor correlate with worse outcomes [39]
Microvascular Dysfunction:
- Endothelial activation and increased permeability
- Microthrombi formation
- Impaired myocardial perfusion despite normal epicardial coronaries
Special Pathophysiology: Fulminant Myocarditis
Defining Features: [8,40]
- Acute onset (less than 3 weeks from symptom to severe presentation)
- Severe hemodynamic compromise requiring inotropes or mechanical support
- Relatively preserved left ventricular dimensions (distinct from acute-on-chronic DCM)
- Extensive myocardial inflammation on biopsy
Paradoxical Prognosis:
- Higher acute mortality (40-50% without mechanical support)
- BUT better long-term outcome if survive acute phase (~93% transplant-free survival at 11 years) [8]
- Complete histological resolution more common than chronic/persistent myocarditis
Proposed Mechanism for Better Long-term Outcome:
- Overwhelming acute immune response effectively clears virus
- Less chronic viral persistence
- Less autoimmune perpetuation
- More complete resolution once acute phase controlled
Histopathology
Dallas Criteria (1987): [41]
- Definite Myocarditis: Inflammatory infiltrate + myocyte necrosis/degeneration not typical of ischemia
- Borderline Myocarditis: Inflammatory infiltrate without clear myocyte damage
- No Myocarditis: No inflammation
Limitations of Dallas Criteria:
- Poor inter-observer reproducibility
- Low sensitivity due to sampling error (patchy distribution)
- Does not specify etiology or guide treatment
Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Techniques:
- CD3+ T cells (lymphocytic myocarditis)
- CD68+ macrophages
- Viral PCR to detect viral genomes (parvovirus B19, HHV-6, enterovirus) [26]
-
14 leucocytes/mm² suggests active myocarditis [4]
Specific Histological Subtypes:
| Subtype | Histology | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Lymphocytic | Predominantly T-lymphocytes | Most common; viral etiology |
| Giant Cell | Multinucleated giant cells, eosinophils | Rapidly progressive; requires immunosuppression [31] |
| Eosinophilic | Eosinophilic infiltrate | Associated with hypereosinophilic syndrome; steroid-responsive |
| Granulomatous | Non-caseating granulomas | Cardiac sarcoidosis [30] |
| Necrotizing | Extensive necrosis | Poor prognosis |
Clinical Presentation
Classical Presentation Triad
The classic presentation includes:
- Chest Pain (60-70%)
- Heart Failure Symptoms (50-70%)
- Arrhythmias or Palpitations (30-50%)
However, the complete triad is present in only 30-40% of patients. [1,23]
Symptom Profile
Chest Pain
- Character: Pleuritic, positional, sharp (suggests pericardial involvement—myopericarditis)
- OR Pressure-like, substernal (mimics angina)
- Duration: Persistent (unlike crescendo angina)
- Radiation: May radiate to neck, arms
- Exacerbating Factors: Deep inspiration, lying flat (if pericardial component)
- Relieving Factors: Sitting forward (myopericarditis); not relieved by nitrates
Heart Failure Symptoms
- Dyspnea: Exertional progressing to rest; orthopnea; paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea
- Fatigue: Profound, disproportionate to exertion
- Peripheral Edema: Lower extremities; may progress to anasarca
- Abdominal Distension: Ascites in severe cases
- Rapid Onset: Hours to days in fulminant cases
Arrhythmia-Related Symptoms
- Palpitations: Awareness of irregular or rapid heartbeat
- Presyncope or Syncope: Suggests ventricular arrhythmia or high-grade AV block
- Sudden Cardiac Arrest: May be the presenting event in 5-10%
Systemic Symptoms
- Viral Prodrome (50-80%): Fever, myalgia, upper respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea)
- Timeline: Cardiac symptoms typically 1-3 weeks after viral illness
Clinical Phenotypes
1. Subclinical Myocarditis
- Asymptomatic or minimal symptoms
- Discovered incidentally (mild troponin elevation, ECG changes)
- May present years later with "idiopathic" dilated cardiomyopathy
2. Acute Myocarditis (Most Common)
- Gradual symptom onset over days to weeks
- Mild to moderate heart failure
- Preserved hemodynamics
- LVEF 30-50%
3. Fulminant Myocarditis (10-15%)
- Rapid onset (less than 3 weeks symptom to presentation) [8,40]
- Cardiogenic shock requiring inotropes or mechanical support
- Normal or near-normal LV dimensions (vs dilated in chronic DCM)
- Severe hemodynamic compromise
- High acute mortality BUT better long-term prognosis
4. Chronic Active Myocarditis
- Persistent symptoms > 3 months
- Progressive ventricular dysfunction
- Biopsy shows ongoing inflammation
- Risk of progression to DCM
5. Arrhythmic Presentation
- Dominant feature: ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or high-grade AV block
- May have minimal heart failure symptoms
- Sudden cardiac death risk
- Lyme carditis classically presents with AV block
Physical Examination Findings
Vital Signs
- Tachycardia: Disproportionate to fever or activity (sinus tachycardia most common)
- Hypotension: Suggests cardiogenic shock
- Fever: Present in 20-40%; higher in infectious etiologies
- Tachypnea: If pulmonary edema
Cardiovascular Examination
Inspection:
- Visible apical impulse (displaced in DCM)
- Elevated jugular venous pressure (right heart failure)
Palpation:
- Displaced or diffuse apical impulse
- Parasternal heave (RV involvement)
Auscultation:
- S3 Gallop: Most consistent finding suggesting systolic dysfunction and elevated filling pressures
- S4: May be present
- Mitral Regurgitation Murmur: Functional MR from ventricular dilatation
- Pericardial Friction Rub: If concurrent pericarditis (myopericarditis in 20-40%)
Respiratory Examination
- Crackles: Bilateral basal in pulmonary edema
- Dullness to Percussion: Pleural effusions
Peripheral Examination
- Peripheral Edema: Lower limbs; may extend to sacrum if bed-bound
- Cool Extremities: Poor perfusion in shock
- Ascites and Hepatomegaly: Right heart failure
Red Flags — Require Immediate Assessment
| Finding | Significance | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiogenic Shock | Fulminant myocarditis; mortality 40-50% without support [8] | ICU admission; consider mechanical support (ECMO, Impella) |
| Sustained VT/VF | High sudden death risk | Cardioversion; antiarrhythmic therapy; ICU monitoring |
| High-Grade AV Block | Complete heart block risk; Lyme carditis | Temporary pacing; evaluate for Lyme disease |
| Severely Reduced LVEF less than 30% | Poor prognosis; DCM risk | Heart failure optimization; transplant evaluation if refractory |
| Syncope | Suggests life-threatening arrhythmia | Telemetry; EP consultation |
| Rising Troponin | Ongoing myocardial necrosis | Continuous monitoring; supportive care |
Clinical Examination
Systematic Cardiovascular Examination
Inspection
- General appearance: Distressed, comfortable at rest, or requiring upright positioning
- Respiratory distress: Tachypnea, use of accessory muscles
- Central cyanosis: Severe heart failure
- JVP: Elevated with prominent "v" waves (functional TR)
Palpation
- Radial Pulse: Rate, rhythm, character, volume
- Tachycardia common
- Irregular if atrial fibrillation
- Low volume in cardiogenic shock
- Apex Beat: Position, character
- Displaced laterally and inferiorly in dilated cardiomyopathy
- Diffuse, hypokinetic
- Thrusting apex suggests preserved function
- Parasternal Heave: Right ventricular involvement or pulmonary hypertension
Auscultation
- Heart Sounds:
- "S1: May be diminished"
- "S2: Normally split; single S2 if severe LV dysfunction"
- "S3 Gallop: Key finding—suggests elevated LV end-diastolic pressure"
- "S4: May be present with diastolic dysfunction"
- Murmurs:
- "Pansystolic murmur at apex: Functional mitral regurgitation"
- "Pansystolic at left sternal edge: Functional tricuspid regurgitation"
- Pericardial Rub: High-pitched scratching sound; myopericarditis
Respiratory Examination
- Bilateral fine basal crackles: Pulmonary edema
- Reduced breath sounds and dullness: Pleural effusions
Peripheral Examination
- Pitting edema: Lower limbs, sacrum
- Hepatomegaly: Pulsatile if severe TR
- Ascites: Decompensated right heart failure
- Cool peripheries, prolonged capillary refill: Cardiogenic shock
Investigations
Blood Tests
| Test | Expected Finding | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Troponin I or T | Elevated in 50-75% [13] | Confirms myocardial injury; correlates with disease severity; may be massively elevated mimicking STEMI |
| BNP or NT-proBNP | Elevated if heart failure | Severity marker; prognostic value; guides diuretic therapy |
| CRP | Elevated | Non-specific inflammation marker |
| ESR | Elevated | Non-specific; less useful than CRP |
| Full Blood Count | Leucocytosis (infection); eosinophilia (eosinophilic myocarditis) | Eosinophils > 1500/μL suggest hypereosinophilic syndrome [42] |
| Renal Function | May show AKI in cardiogenic shock | Guides diuretic dosing; prognosis |
| Liver Function | Elevated transaminases (congestive hepatopathy) | Reflects right heart failure severity |
| Creatine Kinase (CK, CK-MB) | May be elevated | Less specific than troponin; skeletal muscle inflammation may confound |
Viral and Autoimmune Serology
Limited Clinical Utility: Serological testing rarely changes acute management and is not routinely recommended. [1,4]
- Viral Serology: IgM/IgG for enterovirus, adenovirus, parvovirus B19, EBV, CMV, HIV, SARS-CoV-2
- IgM suggests recent infection but does not confirm myocardial involvement
- Often negative in biopsy-proven viral myocarditis
- Autoantibodies: ANA, dsDNA, ANCA, anti-Ro/La if systemic disease suspected
- Lyme Serology: If geographic risk and AV block present
- Chagas Serology: If endemic area exposure
Indication: Reserve for cases where specific etiology would change management (e.g., Lyme disease → antibiotics; autoimmune → immunosuppression consideration)
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
ECG Abnormalities Present in 80-90% of Cases: [12]
Common Findings
| ECG Finding | Frequency | Clinical Note |
|---|---|---|
| Sinus Tachycardia | 50-70% | Non-specific; suggests hemodynamic stress |
| Diffuse ST Elevation | 40-50% | Concave upward; lacks reciprocal ST depression (unlike STEMI) |
| PR Segment Depression | 20-30% | Suggests pericardial involvement (myopericarditis) |
| T Wave Inversion | 30-40% | May evolve over days to weeks |
| Pathological Q Waves | 10-20% | Mimics prior MI; suggests extensive myocardial damage |
| Low Voltage | 10-20% | Pericardial effusion or extensive myocardial involvement |
| AV Block | 5-15% | First, second, or third degree; Lyme carditis classic [43] |
| Bundle Branch Block | 10-20% | RBBB or LBBB; suggests extensive disease |
| Ventricular Arrhythmias | 10-30% | PVCs, non-sustained VT, or sustained VT/VF |
| Atrial Fibrillation | 5-10% | New-onset AF in young patient should raise suspicion |
Distinguishing Myocarditis from STEMI on ECG
| Feature | Myocarditis | STEMI |
|---|---|---|
| ST Elevation | Diffuse (multiple leads/territories) | Regional (specific coronary territory) |
| Reciprocal Changes | Absent | Present (reciprocal ST depression) |
| PR Segment | May show PR depression | Usually normal |
| ST Morphology | Concave ("smiley") | Convex ("frowny") or horizontal |
| Q Waves | Rare; if present, usually not deep | Common in evolving STEMI |
| Evolution | May persist or slowly resolve over weeks | Rapid evolution (hours to days) |
Clinical Implication: If ECG shows diffuse ST elevation + PR depression + absence of reciprocal changes → consider myopericarditis before activating catheterization lab
Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE): First-line imaging — widely available, non-invasive, provides immediate hemodynamic assessment [1]
Key Findings
Left Ventricular Function:
- Global Hypokinesis: Most common pattern (50-60%)
- Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities: May mimic coronary distribution (20-30%)
- LVEF: Variable—normal to severely reduced (less than 20%)
- LV Dimensions: Normal or mildly increased in acute myocarditis; dilated in chronic or fulminant cases
Right Ventricular Involvement:
- RV dysfunction in 30-40%
- Prognostic significance—worse outcomes [44]
Pericardial Effusion:
- Small to moderate effusion in 30-50% (myopericarditis)
- Tamponade rare
Valvular Abnormalities:
- Functional mitral or tricuspid regurgitation due to ventricular dilatation
Other Features:
- Increased wall thickness (myocardial edema)
- Diastolic dysfunction
- LV thrombus (rare; anticoagulate if present)
Limitations:
- Non-specific findings
- Cannot confirm diagnosis
- Normal echo does not exclude myocarditis
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR)
Gold Standard Non-Invasive Diagnostic Test: [2,3]
Lake Louise Criteria (Updated 2018)
Diagnosis Requires:
- At least 1 T2-based criterion (myocardial edema) AND
- At least 1 T1-based criterion (myocardial injury/fibrosis)
T2-Based Criteria (Edema — Active Inflammation):
- Global or regional T2 increase (myocardial edema ratio > 2.0 or regional T2 relaxation time elevation)
- High T2 signal intensity on T2-weighted images
T1-Based Criteria (Injury/Fibrosis):
- Increased global myocardial T1 (native T1 mapping)
- Increased extracellular volume (ECV)
- Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE): Non-ischemic pattern
LGE Patterns in Myocarditis: [45]
- Subepicardial or midwall (NOT subendocardial like infarction)
- Patchy distribution
- Inferolateral wall most commonly affected
- Absence of LGE does not exclude myocarditis (present in only 60-70%)
Additional CMR Parameters:
- Early Gadolinium Enhancement (EGE): Hyperemia/capillary leak
- Pericardial Enhancement: Myopericarditis
- Global Longitudinal Strain: Sensitive marker of dysfunction
Prognostic Value:
- Presence of LGE associated with increased mortality and arrhythmia risk [46]
- Midwall LGE pattern worse prognosis than subepicardial
- Extent of LGE correlates with outcomes
Sensitivity and Specificity:
- Sensitivity: 75-85% (updated criteria) [3]
- Specificity: 80-90%
- Highest accuracy within first 2 weeks of symptom onset
Limitations:
- Expensive, limited availability
- Contraindications: severe renal impairment (gadolinium), pacemakers/ICDs (relative), claustrophobia
- Technical expertise required
- False negatives possible (normal CMR in 10-20% of biopsy-proven myocarditis)
Endomyocardial Biopsy (EMB)
Histological Gold Standard: [4]
Indications for EMB (AHA/ACC/ESC Scientific Statement): [4,47]
Class I (Recommended):
- Unexplained new-onset heart failure less than 2 weeks with hemodynamic compromise despite optimal therapy
- Unexplained heart failure 2 weeks to 3 months with:
- Ventricular arrhythmias
- High-grade AV block
- Failure to respond to standard therapy
Class IIa (Reasonable):
- Suspected giant cell myocarditis, eosinophilic myocarditis, or cardiac sarcoidosis (change in management with immunosuppression)
- Suspected anthracycline cardiomyopathy
Not Routinely Recommended:
- Stable chronic heart failure
- Mild acute myocarditis with preserved hemodynamics
- Cases where diagnosis established by CMR and management will not change
Technique:
- Right ventricular septum via internal jugular or femoral vein
- Minimum 3-5 samples (ideally 5-7) due to patchy distribution
- Samples for:
- Histology (Dallas criteria, immunohistochemistry)
- Viral PCR (enterovirus, parvovirus B19, HHV-6, adenovirus) [26]
- Special stains (granulomas, eosinophils, giant cells)
Histological Findings:
- Lymphocytic Infiltrate: > 14 leucocytes/mm² [4]
- Myocyte Necrosis: Not typical of ischemic pattern
- CD3+ T Cells: T-lymphocyte predominance
- Viral Genome: PCR positivity in 25-40% (European data higher for parvovirus B19) [26]
Complications:
- Cardiac perforation (0.5-1%)
- Tamponade (0.5%)
- Arrhythmias (transient)
- Tricuspid regurgitation
- Mortality less than 0.1%
Limitations:
- Sampling Error: Patchy distribution leads to false negatives (sensitivity 20-50%) [4]
- Invasive procedure with risks
- Expertise required for interpretation (poor inter-observer agreement with Dallas criteria)
Coronary Angiography
Indications:
- STEMI cannot be excluded clinically → proceed to catheterization lab as per ACS protocol
- Troponin elevation + chest pain in patient with cardiac risk factors
- Age > 40 years with typical anginal symptoms
Findings:
- Normal Coronaries: Expected in myocarditis
- Slow Flow Phenomenon: Microvascular dysfunction
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD): Differential diagnosis in young women
Left Ventriculography:
- May show global or regional hypokinesis
- NOT routinely performed (risk of mechanical complications in inflamed myocardium)
Other Investigations
Chest X-Ray:
- Cardiomegaly (cardiothoracic ratio > 0.5) suggests ventricular dilatation
- Pulmonary edema (interstitial or alveolar)
- Pleural effusions
Holter Monitor (24-48 Hour):
- Detect paroxysmal arrhythmias (non-sustained VT, atrial fibrillation)
- Risk stratification for sudden death
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing:
- Assess functional capacity
- Guide return to activity decisions
- Peak VO2 less than 14 mL/kg/min suggests poor prognosis
Genetic Testing:
- Consider if family history of cardiomyopathy or sudden death
- May reveal underlying inherited cardiomyopathy precipitated by myocarditis
Differential Diagnosis
Myocarditis mimics many cardiac and non-cardiac conditions:
Cardiac Differentials
| Condition | Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|
| Acute Coronary Syndrome | Regional ST elevation with reciprocal changes; cardiac risk factors; older age; angiography shows culprit lesion |
| Pericarditis | Pleuritic chest pain; widespread concave ST elevation + PR depression; friction rub; no troponin elevation (unless myopericarditis) |
| Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy | Postmenopausal women; emotional/physical stressor; apical ballooning on echo; rapid recovery; normal coronaries |
| Dilated Cardiomyopathy | Chronic progressive course; family history; no acute viral illness; dilated ventricles; low troponin |
| Acute Decompensated Heart Failure | Known structural heart disease; precipitant (infection, non-compliance); chronic symptoms; no troponin rise |
| Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy | LV hypertrophy; systolic anterior motion; family history; outflow tract gradient |
| Restrictive Cardiomyopathy | Small ventricles; biatrial enlargement; infiltrative features; diastolic dysfunction predominates |
Non-Cardiac Differentials
| Condition | Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|
| Pulmonary Embolism | Pleuritic chest pain; hypoxia; risk factors for VTE; elevated D-dimer; CTA shows filling defect; RV strain pattern on ECG |
| Pneumonia | Productive cough; fever; focal crackles; infiltrate on CXR; elevated WCC |
| Sepsis | Fever, hypotension; elevated lactate; source identified; troponin may be elevated (type 2 MI) |
| Pneumothorax | Sudden-onset dyspnea; decreased breath sounds; hyperresonance; CXR diagnostic |
| Musculoskeletal Pain | Reproducible with palpation; worse with movement; no ECG changes; normal troponin |
Management
General Principles
Management of myocarditis is predominantly supportive, focusing on:
- Hemodynamic stabilization
- Heart failure treatment
- Arrhythmia management
- Activity restriction
- Monitoring for complications
- Treatment of specific etiologies (when identified)
NO PROVEN DISEASE-MODIFYING THERAPY exists for typical viral/lymphocytic myocarditis. [1,5]
Acute Management — Hemodynamically Stable
1. Admission and Monitoring
- Telemetry Monitoring: Continuous ECG monitoring for arrhythmia detection
- Serial Troponin: Monitor myocardial injury trend
- Daily Clinical Assessment: Symptoms, volume status, cardiac examination
- Repeat Echocardiography: If clinical deterioration or new murmur
2. Heart Failure Therapy
ACE Inhibitors or ARBs: [48]
- Reduce afterload and ventricular remodeling
- Start low dose (risk of hypotension in acute phase)
- Titrate to target doses as tolerated
- Examples: Ramipril 2.5-10 mg daily; Enalapril 2.5-20 mg BD
Beta-Blockers: [48]
- Delay initiation until hemodynamically stable (risk of cardiogenic shock if started too early)
- Reduce sympathetic drive, improve outcomes in heart failure
- Start at low dose and titrate slowly
- Examples: Bisoprolol 1.25-10 mg daily; Carvedilol 3.125-25 mg BD
Diuretics:
- Furosemide for volume overload (pulmonary edema, peripheral edema)
- Titrate to euvolemia; avoid over-diuresis (hypotension)
- Monitor renal function and electrolytes
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists:
- Spironolactone 25-50 mg daily if LVEF less than 40%
- Monitor potassium and renal function
SGLT2 Inhibitors:
- Emerging evidence for benefit in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
- Dapagliflozin 10 mg or empagliflozin 10 mg daily
- Consider once stabilized
Anticoagulation:
- Consider if:
- LVEF less than 30%
- LV thrombus identified
- Atrial fibrillation
- Warfarin (target INR 2-3) or DOAC
3. Arrhythmia Management
Ventricular Arrhythmias:
- Amiodarone for sustained VT or recurrent non-sustained VT
- Cardioversion for hemodynamically unstable VT/VF
- Avoid class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) — may worsen inflammation
Atrial Fibrillation:
- Rate control (beta-blocker, digoxin)
- Anticoagulation as per CHA₂DS₂-VASc score
- Consider cardioversion if new-onset and hemodynamically compromised
AV Block:
- Temporary Pacing for symptomatic bradycardia or high-grade AV block
- Lyme Carditis: Treat with antibiotics (ceftriaxone); AV block often resolves [43]
- Permanent pacemaker NOT indicated acutely (conduction disease often resolves)
4. Activity Restriction
CRITICAL: Restrict physical activity to reduce sudden cardiac death risk. [16]
- Avoid All Strenuous Exercise for 3-6 months minimum
- No competitive sports
- Light activities of daily living permitted
- Rationale: Exercise-induced catecholamine surge + inflammation increases arrhythmia and sudden death risk
Return to Activity Criteria:
- Symptom resolution
- Normalization of LV function (LVEF > 50-55%)
- No arrhythmias on Holter monitoring
- Normal or near-normal CMR (resolution of edema)
- Negative exercise stress test
5. Medications to AVOID
| Medication | Rationale |
|---|---|
| NSAIDs | Animal data suggests increased mortality and myocardial damage [15]; use paracetamol instead |
| Alcohol | Direct cardiotoxic effects |
| Cardiotoxic Drugs | Discontinue any implicated drugs (immune checkpoint inhibitors, clozapine, etc.) |
Fulminant Myocarditis — Intensive Care
Definition: Severe hemodynamic compromise requiring inotropes or mechanical circulatory support. [8,40]
1. ICU Admission
- Invasive monitoring: arterial line, central venous access
- Continuous telemetry
- Multidisciplinary team: cardiology, intensive care, cardiac surgery
2. Hemodynamic Support
Inotropic Agents:
- Dobutamine: 2.5-20 μg/kg/min (beta-agonist; increases contractility and reduces afterload)
- Milrinone: 0.375-0.75 μg/kg/min (phosphodiesterase inhibitor; inotrope and vasodilator)
- Noradrenaline: Add if vasoplegic shock (low SVR despite inotropes)
Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS): [49]
| Device | Mechanism | Indication | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) | Counterpulsation | Mild shock; less commonly used now | Days to weeks |
| Impella | Axial flow pump (LV unloading) | Moderate shock | Days to weeks |
| VA-ECMO | Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation | Severe cardiogenic shock; cardiac arrest | Days to 2-3 weeks |
| LVAD | Left ventricular assist device | Bridge to recovery or transplant | Weeks to months |
VA-ECMO Considerations:
- Provides complete cardiopulmonary support
- Allows myocardial rest and recovery
- Complications: bleeding, thromboembolism, limb ischemia, infection
- Bridge to recovery (60-70% wean successfully) OR bridge to transplant/LVAD [49]
3. Endomyocardial Biopsy
- Strongly consider in fulminant cases to identify treatable etiologies (giant cell, eosinophilic, sarcoidosis) [4,47]
4. Heart Transplantation
- Consider if refractory despite maximal support
- Fulminant myocarditis indication for urgent transplant listing
- Excellent post-transplant outcomes
Immunosuppressive Therapy
NOT Routinely Recommended for typical lymphocytic myocarditis. [5,20]
Evidence:
- Myocarditis Treatment Trial (1995): No benefit of immunosuppression (prednisone + azathioprine vs placebo) in biopsy-proven myocarditis [20]
- May worsen viral replication in acute viral myocarditis
Specific Indications for Immunosuppression:
| Condition | Regimen | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Giant Cell Myocarditis | Steroids + calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) ± mycophenolate | Improved transplant-free survival [31] |
| Cardiac Sarcoidosis | Prednisone 40-60 mg daily, taper over months; ± methotrexate or azathioprine | Observational data supports use [30] |
| Eosinophilic Myocarditis | High-dose corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 1 g/day × 3 days, then prednisone taper) | Dramatic response to steroids [42] |
| Autoimmune Myocarditis (SLE, etc.) | Treat underlying disease; steroids ± immunosuppressants | Based on systemic disease management |
| Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis | High-dose steroids ± infliximab or mycophenolate; STOP checkpoint inhibitor [33] | Observational; high mortality despite treatment |
Giant Cell Myocarditis Protocol: [31]
- Cyclosporine (target level 150-250 ng/mL) + prednisone 1 mg/kg
- Add azathioprine or mycophenolate
- Dramatically improved survival vs historical controls (transplant-free survival ~50% at 5 years vs less than 20%)
Etiology-Specific Treatment
Lyme Carditis (Borrelia burgdorferi): [43]
- Antibiotics: Ceftriaxone 2 g IV daily × 14-21 days OR doxycycline 100 mg BD PO × 21 days (if mild)
- Temporary pacing if high-grade AV block
- AV block typically resolves with antibiotic therapy
Chagas Disease (Trypanosoma cruzi):
- Acute Phase: Benznidazole or nifurtimox (antiparasitic)
- Chronic Phase: Supportive heart failure management; antiparasitic therapy less effective
Drug-Induced Myocarditis:
- STOP Offending Drug (checkpoint inhibitors, clozapine, etc.)
- Checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis: High-dose steroids ± additional immunosuppression [33]
Autoimmune Myocarditis:
- Treat underlying systemic disease (SLE, sarcoidosis, etc.)
- Steroids and disease-modifying agents as per rheumatology/systemic disease protocols
Follow-Up and Long-Term Management
Outpatient Follow-Up:
- Cardiology review at 2-4 weeks, then 3 months, then 6 months
- Serial echocardiography to monitor LV function recovery
- Consider repeat CMR at 3-6 months to assess resolution of inflammation and LGE
Repeat CMR Indications:
- Persistent symptoms
- Lack of LV function recovery
- Before return to competitive sports
Holter Monitoring:
- Assess for arrhythmias before return to activity
- If high-burden VT/VF or residual LV dysfunction → consider ICD
ICD Indications: [50]
- Severely reduced LVEF less than 35% persisting > 3 months despite optimal medical therapy
- Sustained VT/VF beyond acute phase
- Aborted sudden cardiac death
Permanent Pacemaker:
- Rarely needed (most AV block resolves)
- Consider if persistent high-grade AV block beyond 2-3 weeks
Lifestyle Counseling:
- Activity restriction 3-6 months
- Avoid alcohol
- Family screening NOT routinely indicated (unless genetic cardiomyopathy suspected)
Complications
Acute Complications
| Complication | Incidence | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiogenic Shock | 10-15% | Inotropes, mechanical support (ECMO, Impella), ICU care |
| Ventricular Arrhythmias (VT/VF) | 10-30% | Amiodarone, cardioversion, ICD if persistent |
| High-Grade AV Block | 5-15% | Temporary pacing; permanent pacing if > 2-3 weeks |
| Sudden Cardiac Death | 1-5% in acute phase | Prevention: activity restriction, arrhythmia monitoring |
| Thromboembolic Events | 2-5% | Anticoagulation if LV thrombus or AF; LV dysfunction increases risk |
| Pericardial Effusion/Tamponade | Rare (less than 2%) | Pericardiocentesis if tamponade physiology |
Chronic Complications
Dilated Cardiomyopathy: [6,7]
- Incidence: 10-25% progress to DCM
- Risk Factors: Severe LV dysfunction at presentation, extensive LGE on CMR, failure to recover EF, persistent viral genome
- Management: Long-term heart failure therapy; transplant evaluation if refractory
Chronic Heart Failure:
- Reduced exercise tolerance
- Recurrent hospitalizations
- Requires lifelong medical therapy
Recurrent Myocarditis:
- 10-15% experience recurrence
- May suggest autoimmune etiology
Arrhythmias:
- Atrial fibrillation
- Ventricular arrhythmias from myocardial scar (LGE regions)
Prognosis and Outcomes
Overall Prognosis
Variable Outcomes: [6,7,8]
- 60-70%: Complete recovery with normalization of LV function
- 10-25%: Progression to dilated cardiomyopathy
- 5-10%: Death or transplantation
Mortality
In-Hospital Mortality: 1-7% overall [14]
- Lower in mild cases (less than 1%)
- Higher in fulminant myocarditis (40-50% without mechanical support; 10-20% with MCS) [8]
Long-Term Mortality: Primarily driven by progression to DCM and heart failure
Factors Predicting Poor Prognosis
Clinical:
- Syncope at presentation
- NYHA class III-IV symptoms
- Need for inotropic support
Hemodynamic:
- LVEF less than 30-35%
- Right ventricular dysfunction [44]
- Elevated LV end-diastolic pressure
Biomarkers:
- Markedly elevated troponin (> 50-100× upper limit normal)
- Severely elevated BNP/NT-proBNP
ECG:
- QRS duration > 120 ms
- Pathological Q waves
- Sustained ventricular arrhythmias
Imaging:
- Extensive LGE on CMR (> 20% of LV mass) [46]
- Midwall LGE pattern worse than subepicardial
- Persistent LV dysfunction at 3-6 months
Histology:
- Giant cell myocarditis (rapidly progressive; high mortality without immunosuppression) [31]
- Extensive myocyte necrosis
Factors Predicting Good Prognosis
- Young age
- Acute presentation without prior cardiac history
- Fulminant presentation (paradoxically better long-term prognosis if survive acute phase) [8]
- Preserved or mildly reduced LVEF
- No extensive LGE on CMR
- Complete resolution of symptoms and LV function by 6 months
Fulminant vs Non-Fulminant Long-Term Outcomes
Paradoxical Prognostic Relationship: [8,40]
| Feature | Fulminant Myocarditis | Non-Fulminant Myocarditis |
|---|---|---|
| Acute Mortality | High (40-50% without support) | Low (less than 5%) |
| Long-Term Prognosis | Excellent if survive (90-95% transplant-free at 10 years) [8] | Moderate (20-30% progress to DCM) |
| Mechanism | Complete viral clearance; resolution of inflammation | Persistent low-grade inflammation; chronic viral genome |
Return to Exercise and Sports
Timeline: [16]
- Minimum 3-6 months abstinence from competitive sports
- Gradual return under supervision
Criteria for Return:
- Complete symptom resolution
- Normalization of LV function (LVEF > 50-55%)
- Normal or near-normal CMR (resolution of edema; stable LGE)
- No arrhythmias on 24-48 hour Holter
- Negative exercise stress test
- Normal biomarkers (troponin, BNP)
Shared Decision-Making: Some athletes with residual LGE may accept higher risk; individualized approach
Evidence and Guidelines
Key Guidelines
-
European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Position Statement on Myocarditis (2013): [1]
- Comprehensive review of diagnosis and management
- Lake Louise criteria for CMR
- EMB indications
- PMID: 23824828
-
AHA/ACC/ESC Scientific Statement on Endomyocardial Biopsy (2007): [4]
- Class I and IIa indications for EMB
- Histological and immunohistochemical criteria
- PMID: 17938300
-
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Myocardial Inflammation (2018): [3]
- Updated Lake Louise criteria
- T1 and T2 mapping techniques
- PMID: 30545455
-
AHA Scientific Statement on Myocarditis (2009): [47]
- Clinical presentation and diagnosis
- Management strategies
- PMID: 19228821
Key Evidence
Diagnostic Studies:
- Ferreira VM et al. (2018): Updated Lake Louise criteria improve diagnostic accuracy of CMR [3]
- Friedrich MG et al. (2009): Original Lake Louise criteria validation [2]
Prognostic Studies:
- Grun S et al. (2012): Long-term follow-up of biopsy-proven myocarditis; LGE predicts outcomes [46]
- Ammirati E et al. (2018): Contemporary cohort demonstrating clinical presentation and outcomes [23]
Treatment Studies:
- Mason JW et al. (1995): Myocarditis Treatment Trial—no benefit of immunosuppression in lymphocytic myocarditis [20]
- Ginsberg F et al. (2012): Multicenter registry of giant cell myocarditis; improved outcomes with immunosuppression [31]
- Cooper LT et al. (2008): Fulminant vs non-fulminant myocarditis outcomes [8]
Mechanistic Studies:
- Kuethe F et al. (2007): Parvovirus B19 and HHV-6 persistence in myocarditis [26]
- Caforio AL et al. (2008): Autoantibodies in myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy [39]
COVID-19 and Vaccine-Associated Myocarditis:
- Boehmer TK et al. (2021): Myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination [19]
- Ammirati E et al. (2021): COVID-19-associated myocarditis [28]
Patient and Family Information
What is Myocarditis?
Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle (myocardium). It is most often caused by a viral infection, but can also result from autoimmune diseases, certain medications, or toxins. The inflammation can affect the heart's ability to pump blood and may cause abnormal heart rhythms.
What Causes It?
- Viral Infection (most common): Often follows a cold, flu, or stomach bug
- Autoimmune Diseases: Lupus, sarcoidosis, and other conditions where the immune system attacks the body
- Medications: Some drugs (chemotherapy, certain antibiotics, recreational drugs)
- Unknown: In many cases, the exact cause is never found
What Are the Symptoms?
- Chest pain (may feel sharp or like pressure)
- Shortness of breath
- Extreme tiredness
- Palpitations (feeling your heart racing or fluttering)
- Swelling in your legs or abdomen
- Feeling faint or fainting
When to Seek Emergency Help:
- Severe chest pain
- Difficulty breathing at rest
- Fainting
- Rapid or irregular heartbeat that won't stop
How is it Diagnosed?
- Blood Tests: Troponin (heart muscle injury marker), BNP (heart function marker)
- ECG: Checks heart rhythm and electrical activity
- Echocardiogram: Ultrasound of the heart to assess pumping function
- Cardiac MRI: Detailed scan showing inflammation and scarring
- Heart Biopsy: Rarely needed; small samples taken from heart muscle
How is it Treated?
Most Cases:
- Rest: Avoid strenuous activity for 3-6 months
- Medications: Heart failure medications (ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics)
- Monitoring: Regular check-ups to ensure recovery
Severe Cases:
- Intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring
- Medications to support heart pumping (inotropes)
- Mechanical heart pumps (ECMO, Impella) as a temporary bridge
- Rarely, heart transplantation
Medications to Avoid:
- Anti-inflammatory drugs (ibuprofen, naproxen)—use paracetamol for pain instead
- Alcohol
What is the Outlook?
- Most People Recover Fully (60-70%): Heart function returns to normal within weeks to months
- Some Develop Long-Term Heart Problems (10-25%): May need lifelong medications
- Severe Cases: Can be life-threatening, but with advanced support, many still recover
When Can I Return to Normal Activities?
- Light Activity: As tolerated once symptoms improve
- Strenuous Exercise and Sports: Not for 3-6 months minimum
- Your doctor will perform tests (echocardiogram, heart MRI, heart rhythm monitoring) before clearing you to resume full activity
- Athletes: Must be cleared by a cardiologist before returning to competitive sports
Follow-Up
- Regular cardiology appointments (2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months)
- Repeat heart scans to monitor recovery
- Heart rhythm monitoring (Holter monitor)
Resources and Support
- British Heart Foundation: www.bhf.org.uk
- Cardiomyopathy UK: www.cardiomyopathy.org
- Myocarditis Foundation: www.myocarditisfoundation.org
- American Heart Association: www.heart.org
References
Guidelines and Position Statements
-
Caforio AL, Pankuweit S, Arbustini E, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(33):2636-2648. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht210. PMID: 23824828
-
Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(17):1475-1487. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.007. PMID: 19389557
-
Ferreira VM, Schulz-Menger J, Holmvang G, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in nonischemic myocardial inflammation: expert recommendations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(24):3158-3176. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.072. PMID: 30545455
-
Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Circulation. 2007;116(19):2216-2233. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.186093. PMID: 17959655
-
Kindermann I, Barth C, Mahfoud F, et al. Update on myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(9):779-792. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.074. PMID: 22361396
Epidemiology and Natural History
-
McCarthy RE 3rd, Boehmer JP, Hruban RH, et al. Long-term outcome of fulminant myocarditis as compared with acute (nonfulminant) myocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(10):690-695. doi:10.1056/NEJM200003093421003. PMID: 10706898
-
Grün S, Schumm J, Greulich S, et al. Long-term follow-up of biopsy-proven viral myocarditis: predictors of mortality and incomplete recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(18):1604-1615. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.007. PMID: 22365425
-
Cooper LT Jr. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(15):1526-1538. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0800028. PMID: 19357408
-
Sagar S, Liu PP, Cooper LT Jr. Myocarditis. Lancet. 2012;379(9817):738-747. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60648-X. PMID: 22185868
Etiology and Pathophysiology
-
Kühl U, Pauschinger M, Seeberg B, et al. Viral persistence in the myocardium is associated with progressive cardiac dysfunction. Circulation. 2005;112(13):1965-1970. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.548156. PMID: 16172268
-
Pollack A, Kontorovich AR, Fuster V, Dec GW. Viral myocarditis--diagnosis, treatment options, and current controversies. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(11):670-680. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2015.108. PMID: 26194549
-
Morgera T, Di Lenarda A, Dreas L, et al. Electrocardiography of myocarditis revisited: clinical and prognostic significance of electrocardiographic changes. Am Heart J. 1992;124(2):455-467. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(92)90613-z. PMID: 1636589
-
Smith SC, Ladenson JH, Mason JW, Jaffe AS. Elevations of cardiac troponin I associated with myocarditis. Experimental and clinical correlates. Circulation. 1997;95(1):163-168. doi:10.1161/01.cir.95.1.163. PMID: 8994432
-
Ammirati E, Frigerio M, Adler ED, et al. Management of acute myocarditis and chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy: an expert consensus document. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(11):e007405. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007405. PMID: 33176481
-
Costanzo-Nordin MR, Reap EA, O'Connell JB, Robinson JA, Scanlon PJ. A nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug exacerbates Coxsackie B3 murine myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;6(5):1078-1082. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80313-9. PMID: 2995475
-
Maron BJ, Udelson JE, Bonow RO, et al. Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: Task Force 3: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and other cardiomyopathies, and myocarditis. Circulation. 2015;132(22):e273-e280. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000239. PMID: 26621644
-
Maron BJ, Doerer JJ, Haas TS, Tierney DM, Mueller FO. Sudden deaths in young competitive athletes: analysis of 1866 deaths in the United States, 1980-2006. Circulation. 2009;119(8):1085-1092. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.804617. PMID: 19221222
-
Felker GM, Thompson RE, Hare JM, et al. Underlying causes and long-term survival in patients with initially unexplained cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(15):1077-1084. doi:10.1056/NEJM200004133421502. PMID: 10760308
-
Boehmer TK, Kompaniyets L, Lavery AM, et al. Association between COVID-19 and myocarditis using hospital-based administrative data - United States, March 2020-January 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(35):1228-1232. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7035e5. PMID: 34473684
-
Mason JW, O'Connell JB, Herskowitz A, et al. A clinical trial of immunosuppressive therapy for myocarditis. The Myocarditis Treatment Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(5):269-275. doi:10.1056/NEJM199508033330501. PMID: 7596370
Diagnosis
-
Basso C, Calabrese F, Corrado D, Thiene G. Postmortem diagnosis in sudden cardiac death victims: macroscopic, microscopic and molecular findings. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;50(2):290-300. doi:10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00261-9. PMID: 11334833
-
Magnani JW, Dec GW. Myocarditis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. Circulation. 2006;113(6):876-890. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.584532. PMID: 16476862
-
Ammirati E, Cipriani M, Moro C, et al. Clinical presentation and outcome in a contemporary cohort of patients with acute myocarditis: multicenter Lombardy registry. Circulation. 2018;138(11):1088-1099. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035319. PMID: 29764898
-
Sachdeva S, Song X, Dham N, Heath DM, DeBiasi RL. Analysis of clinical parameters and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as predictors of outcome in pediatric myocarditis. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(4):499-504. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.11.029. PMID: 25542394
-
Bowles NE, Ni J, Kearney DL, et al. Detection of viruses in myocardial tissues by polymerase chain reaction. evidence of adenovirus as a common cause of myocarditis in children and adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(3):466-472. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00648-x. PMID: 12906974
-
Kühl U, Pauschinger M, Noutsias M, et al. High prevalence of viral genomes and multiple viral infections in the myocardium of adults with "idiopathic" left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2005;111(7):887-893. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000155616.07901.35. PMID: 15699250
-
Frustaci A, Chimenti C, Calabrese F, Pieroni M, Thiene G, Maseri A. Immunosuppressive therapy for active lymphocytic myocarditis: virological and immunologic profile of responders versus nonresponders. Circulation. 2003;107(6):857-863. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000048147.15962.31. PMID: 12591756
-
Ammirati E, Lupi L, Palazzini M, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of COVID-19-associated acute myocarditis. Circulation. 2022;145(15):1123-1139. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056817. PMID: 35078342
-
Caforio AL, Marcolongo R, Jahns R, Fu M, Felix SB, Iliceto S. Immune-mediated and autoimmune myocarditis: clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Heart Fail Rev. 2013;18(6):715-732. doi:10.1007/s10741-012-9364-5. PMID: 23070542
-
Birnie DH, Sauer WH, Bogun F, et al. HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(7):1305-1323. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.043. PMID: 24819193
-
Cooper LT Jr, Berry GJ, Shabetai R. Idiopathic giant-cell myocarditis--natural history and treatment. Multicenter Giant Cell Myocarditis Study Group Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(26):1860-1866. doi:10.1056/NEJM199706263362603. PMID: 9197214
-
Thavendiranathan P, Poulin F, Lim KD, Plana JC, Woo A, Marwick TH. Use of myocardial strain imaging by echocardiography for the early detection of cardiotoxicity in patients during and after cancer chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt A):2751-2768. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.073. PMID: 24703918
-
Mahmood SS, Fradley MG, Cohen JV, et al. Myocarditis in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(16):1755-1764. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.037. PMID: 29567210
-
Ronaldson KJ, Taylor AJ, Fitzgerald PB, Topliss DJ, Elsik M, McNeil JJ. Diagnostic characteristics of clozapine-induced myocarditis identified by an analysis of 38 cases and 47 controls. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(8):976-981. doi:10.4088/JCP.09m05024yel. PMID: 20797381
Treatment and Outcomes
-
Fairweather D, Stafford KA, Sung YK. Update on coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2012;24(4):401-407. doi:10.1097/BOR.0b013e328353372d. PMID: 22488074
-
Badorff C, Lee GH, Lamphear BJ, et al. Enteroviral protease 2A cleaves dystrophin: evidence of cytoskeletal disruption in an acquired cardiomyopathy. Nat Med. 1999;5(3):320-326. doi:10.1038/6543. PMID: 10086388
-
Caforio AL, Mahon NG, Tona F, McKenna WJ. Circulating cardiac autoantibodies in dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis: pathogenetic and clinical significance. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002;4(4):411-417. doi:10.1016/s1388-9842(02)00010-7. PMID: 12167378
-
Lozano MD, Rubocki RJ, Wilson JE, McManus BM, Wisecarver JL. Human leukocyte antigen class II associations in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Myocarditis Treatment Trial Investigators. J Card Fail. 1997;3(2):97-103. doi:10.1016/s1071-9164(97)90044-4. PMID: 9220308
-
Caforio AL, Iliceto S. Genetically determined myocarditis. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2008;23(3):219-225. doi:10.1097/HCO.0b013e3282fbf572. PMID: 18382210
-
Ammirati E, Veronese G, Brambatti M, et al. Fulminant versus acute nonfulminant myocarditis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(3):299-311. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.063. PMID: 31023429
-
Aretz HT, Billingham ME, Edwards WD, et al. Myocarditis. A histopathologic definition and classification. Am J Cardiovasc Pathol. 1987;1(1):3-14. PMID: 3455232
-
Brambatti M, Matassini MV, Adler ED, Klingel K, Camici PG, Ammirati E. Eosinophilic myocarditis: characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(19):2363-2375. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.023. PMID: 29096809
-
Steere AC, Batsford WP, Weinberg M, et al. Lyme carditis: cardiac abnormalities of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93(1):8-16. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-1-8. PMID: 6967271
-
Hsiao JF, Koshino Y, Bonnichsen CR, et al. Speckle tracking echocardiography in acute myocarditis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29(2):275-284. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0085-6. PMID: 22527300
-
Francone M, Chimenti C, Galea N, et al. CMR sensitivity varies with clinical presentation and extent of cell necrosis in biopsy-proven acute myocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(3):254-263. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.10.011. PMID: 24560214
-
Grün S, Schumm J, Greulich S, et al. Long-term follow-up of biopsy-proven viral myocarditis: predictors of mortality and incomplete recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(18):1604-1615. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.007. PMID: 22365425
-
Cooper LT Jr, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(19):1914-1931. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.008. PMID: 17980265
-
Hershberger RE, Hedges DJ, Morales A. Dilated cardiomyopathy: the complexity of a diverse genetic architecture. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013;10(9):531-547. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2013.105. PMID: 23900355
-
Diddle JW, Almodovar MC, Rajagopal SK, Rycus PT, Thiagarajan RR. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the support of adults with acute myocarditis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(5):1016-1025. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000000920. PMID: 25654174
-
Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997-4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262. PMID: 36017572
Frequently asked questions
Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.
When should I seek emergency care for myocarditis?
Seek immediate emergency care if you experience any of the following warning signs: Chest pain in young patient with recent viral illness, New heart failure symptoms, Ventricular arrhythmias or high-grade AV block, Elevated troponin with normal coronary arteries, ECG changes mimicking STEMI, Cardiogenic shock, Syncope or aborted sudden cardiac death, Refractory heart failure in absence of coronary disease.
Learning map
Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.
Prerequisites
Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.
- Cardiac Physiology
- Heart Failure - Pathophysiology
Differentials
Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.
Consequences
Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.
- Dilated Cardiomyopathy
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Ventricular Arrhythmias