Nephrology
Urology
Vascular Surgery
Moderate Evidence
Peer reviewed

Retroperitoneal Fibrosis (RPF)

RPF is classified as: Idiopathic (Primary) : 60-70% of cases, increasingly recognised as part of the IgG4-Related Disease (IgG4-RD) spectrum Secondary : 30-40%, caused by medications (ergot derivatives, methysergide,...

Updated 7 Jan 2026
Reviewed 17 Jan 2026
32 min read
Reviewer
MedVellum Editorial Team
Affiliation
MedVellum Medical Education Platform
Quality score
52

Clinical board

A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.

Urgent signals

Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.

  • Bilateral Ureteric Obstruction
  • Acute Kidney Injury
  • Anuria/Oliguria
  • Vascular Involvement (DVT/IVC obstruction)

Linked comparisons

Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.

  • Lymphoma (Retroperitoneal)
  • Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Editorial and exam context

Reviewed by MedVellum Editorial Team · MedVellum Medical Education Platform

Credentials: MBBS, MRCP, Board Certified

Clinical reference article

Retroperitoneal Fibrosis (RPF)

1. Clinical Overview

Summary

Retroperitoneal Fibrosis (RPF), also known as Ormond's Disease, is a rare fibro-inflammatory condition characterised by the development of dense fibrous tissue in the retroperitoneum, typically surrounding the infrarenal abdominal aorta and iliac vessels, and commonly encasing the ureters, leading to bilateral ureteric obstruction, hydronephrosis, and renal impairment. [1,2]

RPF is classified as:

  • Idiopathic (Primary): ~60-70% of cases, increasingly recognised as part of the IgG4-Related Disease (IgG4-RD) spectrum
  • Secondary: ~30-40%, caused by medications (ergot derivatives, methysergide, beta-blockers), malignancy (lymphoma, sarcoma, metastases), infection (tuberculosis), radiotherapy, inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm, or asbestos exposure [3,4]

The condition presents insidiously with dull lower back or flank pain, constitutional symptoms (weight loss, malaise, low-grade fever), and symptoms of renal impairment. The hallmark imaging finding is a peri-aortic soft tissue mass with medial deviation of the ureters on CT or MRI. [5,6]

Diagnosis requires exclusion of malignancy (often necessitating biopsy), assessment of inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP), and evaluation for IgG4-RD (serum IgG4 levels, tissue IgG4+ plasma cell infiltration). Treatment involves urgent relief of ureteric obstruction (stenting or nephrostomy), corticosteroid therapy (first-line for idiopathic/IgG4-RD), immunosuppressive agents (steroid-sparing or refractory cases), and surgical ureterolysis (for refractory obstruction). [7,8,9]

Prognosis is generally favourable with early treatment, with excellent response to corticosteroids (~85-90% in idiopathic cases), though relapse rates of 20-50% necessitate long-term monitoring. Untreated or delayed diagnosis can lead to irreversible renal failure. [10,11]

Clinical Pearls

"Peri-Aortic Mass with Medial Ureteric Deviation": Pathognomonic imaging appearance on CT. Normal ureters are laterally displaced; RPF causes medial deviation and encasement.

"Exclude Malignancy First": Lymphoma, retroperitoneal sarcoma, and metastatic disease can mimic idiopathic RPF. Biopsy is often mandatory.

"IgG4-RD Association": ~50-60% of idiopathic RPF cases show elevated serum IgG4 and tissue IgG4+ plasma cells. Consider screening for multi-organ IgG4-RD.

"Dramatic Steroid Response": Most idiopathic/IgG4-RD cases respond rapidly to corticosteroids within weeks. Lack of response should prompt reconsideration of diagnosis.

"Bilateral Obstruction = Urgent Decompression": AKI from bilateral ureteric obstruction requires immediate nephrostomy or retrograde stenting before initiating medical therapy.


2. Epidemiology

Demographics

FactorDetails
IncidenceRare: 0.1-1.3 per 100,000 person-years [1,2]
AgePeak incidence: 50-60 years (range 40-70) [3]
SexMale predominance 2-3:1 [4]
Geographic DistributionNo significant variation; reported worldwide
Ethnic PredilectionNone identified

Risk Factors

CategoryRisk Factors
Idiopathic/IgG4-RDAtherosclerosis, smoking, autoimmune conditions
MedicationsErgot derivatives (ergotamine, methysergide), beta-blockers (atenolol, metoprolol), dopamine agonists (bromocriptine, pergolide, cabergoline), hydralazine, methyldopa
MalignancyLymphoma (Hodgkin's, NHL), retroperitoneal sarcoma, metastatic carcinoma (GI, breast, prostate)
VascularInflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (10-15% association), atherosclerosis
InfectionTuberculosis, histoplasmosis, actinomycosis
OtherRadiotherapy (abdominal/pelvic), asbestos exposure, prior retroperitoneal surgery/trauma

Classification

TypeProportionCharacteristics
Idiopathic (Primary)60-70%Unknown aetiology. ~50-60% associated with IgG4-RD. Periaortic inflammation theory (reaction to atherosclerotic plaque antigens). Good response to corticosteroids. [5,6]
IgG4-Related30-40% of idiopathicElevated serum IgG4 (> 135 mg/dL). Tissue: IgG4+ plasma cells, storiform fibrosis, obliterative phlebitis. May have multi-organ involvement (pancreas, bile ducts, salivary glands). [7,8]
Secondary30-40%Identifiable cause. Malignant (15-20%): lymphoma, sarcoma, metastases. Drug-induced (5-10%). Inflammatory AAA (10-15%). Infection (rare). Radiation (rare). [9,10]

Exam Detail: ### Molecular Pathophysiology of Idiopathic RPF

The pathogenesis of idiopathic RPF remains incompletely understood but involves:

  1. Periaortic Inflammation (Periaortitis) Theory [11,12]:

    • Chronic inflammation in response to atherosclerotic plaque antigens (ceroid, oxidised LDL) leaking from aortic wall
    • Immune complex deposition and complement activation
    • T-cell mediated inflammation with CD4+ T-helper cells and macrophage infiltration
    • Progression to fibrous tissue deposition surrounding aorta
  2. IgG4-Related Disease Mechanisms [7,8,13]:

    • Oligoclonal expansion of IgG4+ B-cells and plasma cells
    • Th2-skewed immune response with IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 production
    • Regulatory T-cell (Treg) dysfunction with increased TGF-β and IL-10
    • TGF-β-driven fibrosis: Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis
    • Storiform fibrosis: Characteristic cartwheel/storiform pattern of collagen deposition
    • Obliterative phlebitis: Inflammatory destruction of venules within fibrotic tissue
  3. Fibrotic Cascade:

    • PDGF, CTGF, TGF-β drive fibroblast activation
    • Myofibroblast transformation with α-SMA expression
    • Extracellular matrix deposition: Type I and III collagen, fibronectin
    • Tissue hypoxia and further inflammatory perpetuation

3. Pathophysiology

Anatomical Distribution

RPF most commonly involves:

LocationFrequencyCharacteristics
Infrarenal Aorta> 95%Fibrous plaque centred around aorta at L4-L5 level
Ureters80-100%Encasement and medial deviation at pelvic brim (where ureters cross iliac vessels). Bilateral in 70-80%, unilateral in 20-30%. [14]
Iliac Vessels60-70%Extension along common/external iliac arteries
IVC10-20%Compression or encasement; may cause lower limb oedema/DVT
Renal VesselsRareRenal artery stenosis (renovascular hypertension), renal vein thrombosis
Mesenteric VesselsRareIMA/SMA involvement; bowel ischaemia (very rare)
Gonadal VesselsRareTesticular/ovarian vein involvement

Consequences of Ureteric Obstruction

  1. Hydronephrosis: Dilation of renal pelvis and calyces
  2. Renal Parenchymal Damage:
    • Increased intrapelvic pressure → decreased GFR
    • Tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis
    • Progressive nephron loss
  3. Acute Kidney Injury: Bilateral obstruction → anuria/severe oliguria
  4. Chronic Kidney Disease: Prolonged obstruction → irreversible fibrosis
  5. Post-Obstructive Diuresis: After relief of bilateral obstruction

Secondary RPF Mechanisms

CauseMechanism
MalignancyDirect tumour infiltration or desmoplastic reaction to retroperitoneal malignancy
Drugs (Ergot derivatives)Serotonergic (5-HT2) receptor agonism → fibroblast proliferation. Methysergide withdrawn in many countries due to fibrosis risk (retroperitoneal, cardiac valves, pleura). [15]
Inflammatory AAAAutoimmune-mediated aortitis with adventitial inflammation extending into retroperitoneum
Infection (TB)Granulomatous inflammation → fibrosis
RadiationVascular injury → ischaemia → fibrosis (months to years post-radiotherapy)
AsbestosChronic inflammatory stimulus

4. Clinical Presentation

Symptoms

RPF typically presents insidiously over weeks to months.

SymptomFrequencyCharacteristics
Lower Back Pain75-90%Dull, constant, non-colicky. Poorly localised to lumbar/sacral region. Does NOT radiate like renal colic. [5,14]
Flank Pain60-70%Unilateral or bilateral
Abdominal Pain30-50%Vague, poorly localised
Constitutional Symptoms50-70%Weight loss (often significant, > 5 kg), malaise, fatigue, anorexia, low-grade fever (less than 38°C) [6]
Uraemic Symptoms20-40%Nausea, vomiting, pruritus, altered mental status (advanced renal failure)
Lower Limb Oedema15-30%Bilateral leg swelling from IVC compression/thrombosis [16]
Oliguria/Anuria10-20%Bilateral severe obstruction
Testicular PainRareGonadal vein involvement or varicocele
ClaudicationRareIliac artery involvement

Examination Findings

SignFrequencyNotes
Hypertension30-50%Multifactorial: renal artery stenosis, renal impairment, volume overload [14]
Lower Limb Oedema15-30%Pitting oedema, may be unilateral or bilateral
Abdominal TendernessVariableOften mild or absent
Reduced Urine OutputVariableObserved in bilateral obstruction
Palpable KidneysRareSevere bilateral hydronephrosis
VaricoceleRareLeft-sided, non-compressible (gonadal vein obstruction)
Signs of UraemiaAdvanced casesPericardial rub, altered consciousness, asterixis

Presentation Patterns

  1. Insidious Renal Impairment (Most common):

    • Progressive rise in creatinine over weeks/months
    • Vague back/flank pain
    • Constitutional symptoms
  2. Acute Presentation:

    • Acute bilateral ureteric obstruction
    • AKI with oliguria/anuria
    • Rapid deterioration
  3. Incidental Finding:

    • Asymptomatic, discovered on imaging for other indications
    • Mildly elevated creatinine on routine bloods
  4. Extra-urinary Manifestations:

    • Lower limb DVT/oedema (IVC involvement)
    • Hypertension (renal artery stenosis)
    • Multi-organ IgG4-RD features

5. Differential Diagnosis

Key Differentials

ConditionDistinguishing Features
Retroperitoneal LymphomaDiscrete lymph node masses (not diffuse peri-aortic plaque). B-symptoms prominent. Elevated LDH. Biopsy shows lymphoma. [17]
Retroperitoneal SarcomaLarge, heterogeneous mass with displacement (not encasement) of structures. Biopsy diagnostic.
Metastatic CarcinomaPrimary tumour history. Multiple organ involvement. Biopsy shows adenocarcinoma/other histology.
IgG4-Related Disease (Systemic)Multi-organ involvement: autoimmune pancreatitis, sclerosing cholangitis, sialadenitis, orbital pseudotumour. Elevated serum IgG4. Overlap with idiopathic RPF. [7,8]
Inflammatory AAAAortic aneurysm present (> 3 cm diameter). Periaortic inflammation/thickening. May coexist with RPF. [18]
Tuberculous Retroperitoneal LymphadenitisTB risk factors. Necrotic lymph nodes. Positive TB cultures/PCR. Granulomas on biopsy.
Primary Retroperitoneal Fibrosis MimicsEndometriosis, desmoid tumours, sclerosing mesenteritis (rare)

Comparison: Idiopathic RPF vs. Malignant Retroperitoneal Disease

FeatureIdiopathic RPFMalignant Disease
Imaging PatternSmooth, homogeneous peri-aortic plaque encasing structuresIrregular, heterogeneous masses displacing structures
Ureteric InvolvementMedial deviation and encasementLateral displacement or direct invasion
LymphadenopathyAbsent or minimal reactive nodesBulky, discrete lymph nodes
Contrast EnhancementDelayed homogeneous enhancementVariable, heterogeneous enhancement
PET AvidityModerate FDG uptake (inflammation)High FDG uptake (malignancy)
Systemic FeaturesLow-grade fever, weight loss, fatigueB-symptoms, cachexia
Response to SteroidsRapid improvementNo response or progression
BiopsyFibrosis, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, IgG4+ cellsMalignant cells (lymphoma, sarcoma, carcinoma)

6. Investigations

Laboratory Investigations

TestFindings in RPFNotes
U&Es / Serum CreatinineElevated creatinine (50-90% at presentation). Degree of elevation reflects severity of obstruction. [5,14]Baseline and serial monitoring essential
eGFRReduced (may be severely reduced less than 15 mL/min/1.73m² in bilateral obstruction)
ElectrolytesHyperkalaemia, metabolic acidosis (renal failure)
FBCNormocytic anaemia (chronic disease, CKD). Mild leucocytosis (inflammation).
ESRElevated (often > 50 mm/hr in active disease) [6,14]Useful for monitoring disease activity and treatment response
CRPElevated (> 20 mg/L)Correlates with active inflammation
Serum IgG4Elevated (> 135 mg/dL) in 50-60% of idiopathic cases [7,8]NOT specific (also elevated in other conditions). Levels > 280 mg/dL more suggestive of IgG4-RD.
LFTsUsually normalElevated ALP may suggest biliary IgG4-RD involvement
LDHNormal or mildly elevatedMarkedly elevated in lymphoma
ANA, RF, ANCAUsually negativeExclude vasculitis and other autoimmune diseases
Complement (C3, C4)Normal
UrinalysisBland sediment (no haematuria, no proteinuria)Distinguishes from glomerulonephritis
Urine CultureNegative (unless secondary UTI)

Imaging

CT Abdomen and Pelvis (Contrast-Enhanced)

First-line and gold standard imaging modality. [5,6,14]

FindingDescription
Peri-aortic Soft Tissue MassHomogeneous, well-defined soft tissue surrounding infrarenal aorta and iliac vessels. Hypodense to muscle on non-contrast. Delayed contrast enhancement (fibrotic tissue has low vascularity).
Medial Ureteric DeviationPathognomonic: Ureters deviated medially at L4-L5 level (normal ureters lie laterally). Encasement and smooth narrowing.
HydronephrosisBilateral in 70-80%, unilateral in 20-30%. Degree correlates with obstruction severity.
IVC InvolvementCompression or encasement. May show IVC thrombosis.
Aortic ChangesMay show atherosclerosis, calcification. Rule out inflammatory AAA (diameter > 3 cm).
LymphadenopathyAbsent or minimal reactive nodes (prominent nodes suggest lymphoma).
ExtentTypically L4-S1 level, centred around aortic bifurcation.

CT Staging: Assess extent of fibrosis, degree of ureteric obstruction, and vascular involvement.

MRI Abdomen and Pelvis

Superior soft tissue characterisation. Useful for:

  • Contraindication to CT contrast (severe CKD, contrast allergy)
  • Monitoring treatment response (no radiation)
  • Differentiating active inflammation from chronic fibrosis
SequenceFindings
T1-weightedHypointense to muscle
T2-weightedVariable: hyperintense (active inflammation, oedema) vs. hypointense (chronic fibrosis)
Post-Gadolinium T1Delayed enhancement (fibrotic tissue). Early enhancement suggests active inflammation.
DWIRestricted diffusion in active inflammation

Ultrasound Abdomen

Limited sensitivity for retroperitoneal mass. Useful for:

  • Detecting hydronephrosis (bilateral/unilateral)
  • Assessing renal parenchymal thickness
  • Bedside evaluation in AKI
  • Follow-up of hydronephrosis after stenting

PET-CT

Increasingly used for:

  1. Differentiating Inflammation from Fibrosis: FDG-avid lesions indicate active inflammation (treatable with immunosuppression). Low uptake suggests chronic fibrosis. [19]
  2. Excluding Malignancy: Patterns of uptake (diffuse peri-aortic vs. focal nodal) help distinguish RPF from lymphoma/sarcoma.
  3. Assessing Multi-organ IgG4-RD: Detect pancreatic, salivary gland, lymph node involvement.
  4. Monitoring Treatment Response: Reduction in FDG uptake indicates response to therapy.

Intravenous Pyelography (IVP)

Historically used, now largely replaced by CT/MRI. Shows:

  • Delayed contrast excretion (obstruction)
  • Medial ureteric deviation
  • Hydronephrosis

Tissue Biopsy

Indications:

  • Exclude malignancy (mandatory if imaging atypical or lymphadenopathy present)
  • Confirm IgG4-RD (tissue IgG4+ plasma cells)
  • Atypical presentation or poor response to treatment

Methods:

  • CT-guided percutaneous biopsy: Most common, relatively safe
  • Laparoscopic/open biopsy: If percutaneous non-diagnostic or high suspicion of malignancy

Histopathology [7,8,20]:

FeatureIdiopathic RPFIgG4-Related RPFMalignant
MacroscopicDense, white-grey fibrous tissueSimilar to idiopathicVariable (soft, necrotic, haemorrhagic)
FibrosisDense collagenous fibrosisStoriform fibrosis (cartwheel pattern)Absent or desmoplastic reaction
Inflammatory InfiltrateLymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophagesHeavy lymphoplasmacytic infiltrateAtypical lymphoid or sarcomatous cells
IgG4+ Plasma Cellsless than 10 per HPF> 10-50 per HPF. IgG4/IgG ratio > 40%.Absent
Obliterative PhlebitisAbsentPresent (characteristic)Absent
NecrosisAbsentAbsentMay be present (malignancy)
EosinophilsMinimalMay be numerousVariable

Renal Tract Imaging for Obstruction Relief

  • Antegrade Pyelography: Via percutaneous nephrostomy; delineates anatomy for ureteric stenting
  • Retrograde Pyelography: Via cystoscopy; confirms ureteric obstruction level and guides stent placement

7. Management

Management Algorithm

SUSPECTED RETROPERITONEAL FIBROSIS
(Back/flank pain, ↑creatinine, constitutional symptoms)
                    ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  CONFIRM DIAGNOSIS                               │
│  - CT abdomen/pelvis (contrast): Peri-aortic mass│
│  - MRI (if CT contraindicated)                   │
│  - Labs: U&Es, ESR, CRP, FBC, serum IgG4         │
│  - PET-CT (if available): Assess activity,       │
│    exclude malignancy                            │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                    ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  EXCLUDE MALIGNANCY                              │
│  - Atypical imaging: BIOPSY (CT-guided)          │
│  - Lymphadenopathy: BIOPSY                       │
│  - If typical imaging + IgG4 elevation: May      │
│    proceed without biopsy in select cases        │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                    ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  ASSESS OBSTRUCTION SEVERITY                     │
│  - Serum creatinine, eGFR                        │
│  - Degree of hydronephrosis (imaging)            │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
        ↓                               ↓
SIGNIFICANT OBSTRUCTION          NO/MILD OBSTRUCTION
(Cr > 200 μmol/L, bilateral       (Cr less than 200 μmol/L, stable)
hydronephrosis, AKI)
        ↓                               ↓
**URGENT DRAINAGE**              PROCEED TO MEDICAL THERAPY
 - Retrograde ureteric stent
   (via cystoscopy) [First choice]
   OR
 - Percutaneous nephrostomy
   (if retrograde fails)
        ↓
   Reassess renal function 24-72 hrs
   Expect improvement if obstruction relieved
        ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  MEDICAL THERAPY (IDIOPATHIC / IgG4-RD)                  │
│                                                          │
│  **FIRST-LINE: CORTICOSTEROIDS**                         │
│  - Prednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day (30-60 mg/day)          │
│  - Continue 4-6 weeks, then gradual taper over 6-12 mths│
│  - Monitor ESR/CRP (monthly), renal function (weekly     │
│    initially, then monthly), imaging at 3-6 months       │
│  - Response expected: ESR/CRP ↓ within 2-4 weeks,       │
│    renal function improvement, reduction in mass size    │
│                                                          │
│  **If no response after 4-6 weeks**: Reconsider diagnosis│
│  (malignancy?), increase dose, or add steroid-sparing    │
│  agent                                                   │
│                                                          │
│  **STEROID-SPARING / REFRACTORY (Second-Line)**          │
│  - Tamoxifen 20 mg BD (anti-fibrotic)                   │
│  - Mycophenolate Mofetil 1-2 g/day                      │
│  - Azathioprine 1-2 mg/kg/day                           │
│  - Methotrexate 10-25 mg/week                           │
│  - Rituximab (For IgG4-RD, refractory cases)            │
│                                                          │
│  **Indications for steroid-sparing agents**:             │
│  - Steroid intolerance/contraindication                  │
│  - Relapse on steroid tapering                          │
│  - Steroid-dependent disease                            │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
        ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  SURGICAL THERAPY (URETEROLYSIS)                         │
│                                                          │
│  **Indications**:                                        │
│  - Failed/inadequate response to medical therapy         │
│  - Recurrent ureteric obstruction despite stenting       │
│  - Steroid contraindication + severe obstruction         │
│  - Patient preference (avoid long-term immunosuppression)│
│                                                          │
│  **Procedure**:                                          │
│  - Surgical freeing of ureters from fibrotic tissue      │
│  - Intraperitonealisation: Ureters wrapped in omentum    │
│    or moved intraperitoneally (prevents re-encasement)   │
│  - Approach: Open (midline laparotomy) or Laparoscopic   │
│                                                          │
│  **Outcomes**:                                           │
│  - Success rate 80-90% (freedom from obstruction)        │
│  - Lower relapse rate than medical therapy alone         │
│  - May still require adjunct medical therapy             │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
        ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  SECONDARY RPF                                           │
│  - Identify and treat underlying cause:                  │
│    • Malignancy: Chemotherapy/radiotherapy               │
│    • Medications: STOP causative drug                    │
│    • Infection (TB): Anti-tuberculous therapy            │
│    • Inflammatory AAA: May still benefit from steroids   │
│  - Ureteric drainage as above                            │
│  - May require surgical debulking if mass effect         │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
        ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  LONG-TERM MONITORING                                    │
│  - Renal function (U&Es, eGFR): 3-monthly initially,     │
│    then 6-monthly                                        │
│  - Inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP): 3-monthly            │
│  - Imaging (CT/MRI): 6-monthly for first 2 years, then   │
│    annually                                              │
│  - Monitor for relapse (20-50% on steroid taper)         │
│  - Stent changes: Every 3-6 months if long-term stenting │
│  - Screen for multi-organ IgG4-RD (if applicable)        │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Medical Therapy Details

Corticosteroids (First-Line) [9,10,21]

AspectDetails
IndicationIdiopathic RPF, IgG4-related RPF
RegimenPrednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day (typically 40-60 mg/day) for 4-6 weeks, then taper by 5-10 mg every 2-4 weeks over 6-12 months. Aim for maintenance 5-10 mg/day or discontinuation.
Response Rate85-90% show clinical and biochemical improvement [10,11]
Time to ResponseESR/CRP normalize within 2-4 weeks. Renal function improves over 4-12 weeks. Imaging shows mass regression over 3-6 months.
MonitoringWeekly U&Es initially, then monthly. Monthly ESR/CRP. Imaging at 3 and 6 months, then 6-12 monthly.
Side EffectsHyperglycaemia, hypertension, osteoporosis, weight gain, infection risk. Bone protection (calcium/vitamin D, bisphosphonates) and PPI recommended.
DurationTypically 12-24 months. Some patients require indefinite low-dose maintenance.
Relapse20-50% relapse on tapering [11]. Increase dose or add steroid-sparing agent.

Tamoxifen (Steroid-Sparing) [22]

AspectDetails
MechanismAnti-oestrogen effects and anti-fibrotic properties. Inhibits TGF-β and fibroblast proliferation.
Dose20 mg BD (twice daily)
UseAs adjunct to steroids (steroid-sparing) or monotherapy in steroid-intolerant patients
EvidenceSmall studies show efficacy in reducing fibrosis and preventing relapse [22]
Side EffectsVTE risk (monitor, consider thromboprophylaxis if high risk), menopausal symptoms (hot flushes), endometrial hyperplasia (annual gynaecology review in women)
DurationTypically 1-2 years

Other Immunosuppressive Agents

AgentDoseRoleEvidence
Mycophenolate Mofetil1-2 g/day (divided BD)Steroid-sparing, IgG4-RDCase series show benefit [23]
Azathioprine1-2 mg/kg/daySteroid-sparing, maintenanceLimited evidence; older agent
Methotrexate10-25 mg/week (with folic acid 5 mg/week)Steroid-sparingSmall studies
Rituximab1 g IV day 0 and 14, repeat every 6 monthsIgG4-RD, refractory casesIncreasing evidence for IgG4-RD [24]

Rituximab: Particularly effective in IgG4-related RPF. Depletes B-cells, reduces IgG4+ plasma cells. Reserved for refractory or relapsing disease.

Surgical Management

Ureteric Drainage Procedures

ProcedureIndicationTechniqueDuration
Retrograde Ureteric StentFirst-line for ureteric obstructionCystoscopy with guidewire and stent placement (Double-J stent, 6-8 Fr)Temporary (3-6 months). Requires regular changes.
Percutaneous NephrostomyFailed retrograde stenting, severe hydronephrosis, emergency drainageUltrasound/CT-guided percutaneous catheter into renal pelvisTemporary. External drainage bag. Convert to stent when feasible.

Complications of Long-term Stenting: UTI, encrustation, stent migration, patient discomfort, need for regular changes (every 3-6 months).

Ureterolysis [25,26]

Definitive surgical treatment for refractory ureteric obstruction.

AspectDetails
IndicationsFailed medical therapy. Recurrent obstruction despite stenting. Steroid intolerance/contraindication. Patient preference (avoid long-term immunosuppression).
TechniqueOpen (midline laparotomy) or Laparoscopic/Robotic approach. Dissection and freeing of ureters from fibrotic tissue. Intraperitonealisation: Ureters wrapped in omentum (omental wrap) or lateralised and fixed to psoas muscle to prevent re-encasement. May combine with biopsy for diagnosis.
Success Rate80-95% achieve long-term freedom from obstruction [25,26]
OutcomesRenal function stabilisation or improvement (if not irreversible damage). Reduced need for long-term stenting.
ComplicationsUreteric injury, haemorrhage, infection, ileus, recurrence (10-20%, usually years later)
Adjunct TherapyOften combined with postoperative steroids/immunosuppression to prevent recurrence

Aortic Surgery

If inflammatory AAA coexists:

  • May require aortic aneurysm repair (open or endovascular)
  • Ureterolysis may be combined with aortic surgery
  • Increased operative risk due to inflammation

8. Complications

Renal Complications

ComplicationFrequencyMechanismManagement
Acute Kidney Injury30-50% at presentationBilateral ureteric obstructionUrgent drainage (stent/nephrostomy). Supportive care. May require temporary dialysis.
Chronic Kidney Disease40-60% develop CKD [14]Prolonged obstruction → irreversible tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosisEarly intervention critical. Long-term nephrology follow-up.
End-Stage Renal Disease5-15%Delayed diagnosis or treatment failureDialysis or transplantation. Recurrence post-transplant rare.
Post-Obstructive DiuresisAfter bilateral reliefTubular dysfunction, solute/water lossFluid replacement. Monitor electrolytes.
Recurrent UTIWith long-term stentsStent biofilm, impaired drainageProphylactic antibiotics, regular stent changes

Vascular Complications

ComplicationFrequencyMechanismManagement
Renovascular Hypertension10-20%Renal artery stenosis from periaortic fibrosisACE inhibitors/ARBs (caution in bilateral stenosis). Angioplasty rarely needed.
IVC Thrombosis/Compression5-15%IVC encasement/stenosisAnticoagulation for thrombosis. Rarely requires IVC stenting.
Lower Limb DVT10-15%IVC obstruction, venous stasisAnticoagulation. Compression stockings.
Lower Limb Oedema15-30%IVC/iliac vein compressionDiuretics. Compression stockings. Treat underlying RPF.
Aortic Aneurysm10-15% (Inflammatory AAA association)Shared pathophysiologySurveillance imaging. Repair if indicated.
ComplicationFrequencyNotes
Relapse of RPF20-50% on steroid tapering [11]Recurrent inflammation and fibrosis. Monitor ESR/CRP, imaging. May require re-escalation of immunosuppression or addition of steroid-sparing agent.
Steroid Side EffectsCommon with long-term useHyperglycaemia, osteoporosis, weight gain, hypertension, infection, avascular necrosis. Mitigation: Bone protection, PPI, minimize duration.
Multi-Organ IgG4-RDIn IgG4-related casesPancreatitis, sclerosing cholangitis, sialadenitis, orbital disease. Screen with imaging/serology.
Malignancy Misdiagnosis5-10%Delayed diagnosis if biopsy not performed. Progression of underlying lymphoma/sarcoma.

9. Prognosis and Outcomes

Overall Prognosis

FactorDetails
With Early TreatmentExcellent prognosis. 85-90% respond to corticosteroids with stabilisation or improvement of renal function. [10,11]
Renal Function RecoveryDepends on duration and severity of obstruction. Reversible if treated within weeks to months. Prolonged obstruction (> 3-6 months) may cause irreversible CKD.
MortalityLow with treatment. Mortality primarily from renal failure (if untreated) or comorbidities.
Relapse Rate20-50% relapse on steroid tapering. Requires long-term monitoring. [11]

Prognostic Factors

FactorGood PrognosisPoor Prognosis
Timing of DiagnosisEarly (less than 3 months symptoms)Delayed (> 6 months)
Baseline Renal FunctionCr less than 200 μmol/L, eGFR > 30Cr > 400 μmol/L, eGFR less than 15 (may have irreversible damage)
Type of RPFIdiopathic/IgG4-related (steroid-responsive)Secondary malignant (poor, depends on cancer prognosis)
Response to SteroidsRapid improvement in ESR/CRP and renal functionNo response (suggests malignancy or extensive fibrosis)
Surgical InterventionSuccessful ureterolysis (80-90% long-term success)Recurrence post-surgery (10-20%)
ComplianceAdherent to therapy and monitoringNon-compliance with immunosuppression/follow-up

Long-Term Outcomes

OutcomePercentageNotes
Complete Remission60-70%Steroid taper completed, no relapse, stable renal function, no residual fibrosis
Partial Remission20-30%Improved but require maintenance therapy (low-dose steroids or steroid-sparing agents)
Relapse20-50%On steroid tapering or after discontinuation. May require re-escalation or surgery.
Steroid-Dependent10-20%Cannot taper steroids without relapse. Require steroid-sparing agents.
CKD Stage 3-540-60%Residual impairment from chronic obstruction [14]
ESRD Requiring RRT5-15%Delayed diagnosis or refractory disease
Recurrence Post-Ureterolysis10-20%Over years. May require revision surgery or medical therapy. [25,26]

10. Evidence and Guidelines

Key Guidelines

GuidelineYearRecommendations
No Formal Consensus Guidelines Exist-Management based on case series, retrospective studies, and expert opinion.
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) - IgG4-RD2015Recommends corticosteroids as first-line for IgG4-related disease. Rituximab for refractory cases. [27]
International Consensus Guidance on IgG4-RD2020Diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD. Recommends serum IgG4, tissue biopsy, exclusion of malignancy. Treatment: Glucocorticoids first-line, steroid-sparing agents for relapse. [8]

Landmark Studies

StudyYearKey FindingsReference
Vaglio et al. - Lancet Review2006Comprehensive review of RPF pathophysiology, classification, and management. Highlighted periaortitis and IgG4 association.[1]
van Bommel et al. - Medicine2009Long-term outcomes study: 80% response to steroids, 20% relapse rate. Emphasized early diagnosis importance.[10]
Khosroshahi et al. - Arthritis Rheum2013IgG4-related RPF subset identified. Higher serum IgG4, tissue IgG4+ cells, better response to rituximab.[13]
Runowska et al. - Rheumatology2016Tamoxifen as steroid-sparing agent: Reduced relapse rate, well-tolerated.[22]
Scheel et al. - NEJM Perspective2017Updated classification: Emphasized secondary causes (drug-induced, malignancy). Importance of biopsy to exclude malignancy.[9]

Evidence Levels

InterventionEvidence LevelQuality
Corticosteroids for idiopathic RPFLevel II-IIIProspective cohort studies, case series. No RCTs. Strong observational evidence.
UreterolysisLevel IIIRetrospective surgical series. High success rates (80-90%).
TamoxifenLevel IIISmall case series and cohort studies. Promising but limited data.
Rituximab for IgG4-RDLevel IIProspective cohort studies in IgG4-RD showing benefit.
PET-CT for diagnosis/monitoringLevel IIICase series showing utility. Not yet standard.

11. Examination Focus

High-Yield Exam Topics

Classic Viva Questions

Q1: A 58-year-old man presents with lower back pain, weight loss, and creatinine of 320 μmol/L (eGFR 18 mL/min/1.73m²). CT shows a peri-aortic soft tissue mass encasing the ureters with medial deviation and bilateral hydronephrosis. What is the most likely diagnosis?

Model Answer: The most likely diagnosis is Retroperitoneal Fibrosis (RPF), also known as Ormond's Disease. The key features are:

  1. Peri-aortic soft tissue mass surrounding the infrarenal aorta
  2. Medial ureteric deviation with encasement (pathognomonic for RPF; normal ureters are lateral)
  3. Bilateral hydronephrosis causing obstructive renal impairment
  4. Constitutional symptoms (weight loss) and back pain

The differential diagnosis includes malignancy (retroperitoneal lymphoma, sarcoma, metastatic disease), which must be excluded with biopsy if imaging is atypical or lymphadenopathy is present.


Q2: What is the first-line management for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis with bilateral ureteric obstruction and AKI?

Model Answer: Management is two-pronged:

  1. Immediate ureteric drainage to relieve obstruction:

    • Retrograde ureteric stenting (via cystoscopy, first choice)
    • Percutaneous nephrostomy if retrograde stenting fails
    • Expect improvement in renal function within 24-72 hours
  2. Medical therapy with corticosteroids (once obstruction relieved):

    • Prednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day (40-60 mg/day)
    • Continue 4-6 weeks, then taper over 6-12 months
    • Monitor ESR/CRP (monthly), renal function, and imaging (3-6 months)
    • 85-90% response rate in idiopathic/IgG4-related cases

Important: Exclude malignancy first (biopsy if atypical features). Check serum IgG4 (elevated in 50-60% of idiopathic cases).


Q3: What is the association between retroperitoneal fibrosis and IgG4-related disease?

Model Answer: 50-60% of idiopathic RPF cases are now recognised as part of the IgG4-Related Disease (IgG4-RD) spectrum. [7,8]

Diagnostic features of IgG4-related RPF:

  1. Serum IgG4 elevation (> 135 mg/dL, often > 280 mg/dL)
  2. Tissue histology:
    • Dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with > 10 IgG4+ plasma cells per HPF
    • IgG4/IgG ratio > 40%
    • Storiform fibrosis (cartwheel pattern of collagen)
    • Obliterative phlebitis (inflammatory vein destruction)
  3. Multi-organ involvement (may coexist):
    • Autoimmune pancreatitis (type 1)
    • Sclerosing cholangitis
    • Sialadenitis (salivary glands)
    • Orbital pseudotumour
    • Tubulointerstitial nephritis

Treatment implications:

  • Excellent response to corticosteroids
  • Rituximab (anti-CD20) highly effective in refractory IgG4-RD cases
  • Screen for multi-organ involvement

Q4: What are the causes of secondary retroperitoneal fibrosis?

Model Answer: Secondary RPF accounts for 30-40% of cases. Key causes:

CategoryExamples
Malignancy (15-20%)Lymphoma (Hodgkin's, NHL), retroperitoneal sarcoma, metastatic carcinoma (GI, breast, prostate)
Medications (5-10%)Ergot derivatives (methysergide, ergotamine), dopamine agonists (bromocriptine, pergolide, cabergoline), beta-blockers, hydralazine, methyldopa
Vascular (10-15%)Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (periaortic inflammation), atherosclerosis
Infection (Rare)Tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, actinomycosis
Radiation (Rare)Abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy (months to years post-treatment)
OtherAsbestos exposure, prior retroperitoneal surgery/trauma

Key point: Always exclude malignancy (particularly lymphoma) with biopsy if imaging atypical.


Q5: Describe the surgical procedure of ureterolysis. What are the indications?

Model Answer:

Ureterolysis is the surgical freeing of the ureters from surrounding fibrotic tissue.

Indications:

  • Failed or inadequate response to medical therapy (steroids/immunosuppression)
  • Recurrent ureteric obstruction despite stenting
  • Steroid intolerance or contraindication with severe obstruction
  • Patient preference to avoid long-term immunosuppression

Technique:

  1. Approach: Open (midline laparotomy) or Laparoscopic/Robotic
  2. Dissection: Careful dissection and freeing of ureters from dense fibrotic plaque
  3. Intraperitonealisation (critical to prevent recurrence):
    • Omental wrap: Ureters wrapped in omentum (provides vascular supply and barrier)
    • Lateralisation: Ureters moved laterally and fixed to psoas muscle
  4. Biopsy: Often performed to confirm diagnosis and exclude malignancy

Outcomes:

  • Success rate: 80-95% long-term freedom from obstruction [25,26]
  • Recurrence: 10-20% (usually years later)
  • Complications: Ureteric injury, bleeding, infection, ileus

Adjunct: Often combined with postoperative steroids to prevent fibrosis recurrence.


Examination Pearls

"Medial Ureteric Deviation = RPF Until Proven Otherwise": Normal ureters lie lateral to transverse processes. RPF causes characteristic medial displacement and encasement.

"Exclude Malignancy Before Starting Steroids": Lymphoma can mimic RPF. Biopsy if any atypical features or lymphadenopathy.

"Tamoxifen is Anti-Fibrotic": Used as steroid-sparing agent. Inhibits TGF-β. Dose 20 mg BD. Monitor for VTE.

"PET-CT Differentiates Inflammation from Fibrosis": FDG-avid = active inflammation (treat with immunosuppression). Low uptake = chronic fibrosis (less likely to respond).

"Intraperitonealisation Prevents Recurrence": Key step in ureterolysis. Omental wrap or lateral fixation stops ureters being re-encased.

"ESR/CRP Track Disease Activity": Normalisation indicates response to treatment. Rising markers suggest relapse.


Common Exam Pitfalls

PitfallCorrection
Assuming all RPF is idiopathicAlways exclude secondary causes (malignancy, drugs). Biopsy if atypical.
Starting steroids before relieving obstructionDrain first, treat second. Bilateral obstruction requires urgent stenting/nephrostomy before steroids.
Missing IgG4-RD associationCheck serum IgG4 in all idiopathic cases. Screen for multi-organ IgG4-RD.
Not monitoring for relapse20-50% relapse on steroid taper. Long-term monitoring (ESR/CRP, imaging) essential.
Forgetting tamoxifen as steroid-sparing optionEffective anti-fibrotic agent. Use in steroid-intolerant or relapsing cases.

12. Patient and Layperson Explanation

What is Retroperitoneal Fibrosis?

Retroperitoneal Fibrosis (RPF), also called Ormond's Disease, is a rare condition where scar-like fibrous tissue develops in the space behind the abdomen (called the retroperitoneum). This tissue usually forms around the main blood vessel (aorta) that runs down the back of your tummy.

The problem is that this fibrous tissue can wrap around and squeeze the tubes (ureters) that carry urine from your kidneys to your bladder. When these tubes get blocked, urine backs up into the kidneys, causing them to swell (hydronephrosis) and potentially leading to kidney damage or failure.


What Causes It?

In about 2 out of 3 cases, we don't know the exact cause (idiopathic). It may be related to:

  • Your immune system overreacting and causing inflammation
  • A condition called IgG4-Related Disease, where the immune system attacks your own tissues
  • Cholesterol buildup in the blood vessel wall triggering inflammation

In the other 1 out of 3 cases (secondary), RPF is caused by:

  • Certain medications (some migraine drugs, blood pressure tablets)
  • Cancer (lymphoma, tumours in the abdomen)
  • Infections like tuberculosis
  • Radiation therapy to the abdomen
  • Swelling of the aorta (inflammatory aneurysm)

What Are the Symptoms?

RPF usually develops slowly over weeks to months. Common symptoms include:

  • Lower back pain or flank pain: Dull, constant ache (not sharp like kidney stones)
  • Feeling unwell: Tiredness, weight loss, low-grade fever
  • Reduced urine output: If both ureters are blocked
  • Leg swelling: If the large vein (IVC) is compressed
  • High blood pressure: From kidney problems

Many people don't have obvious symptoms early on and are diagnosed when routine blood tests show kidney function problems.


How is it Diagnosed?

  1. Blood Tests:

    • Kidney function (creatinine, eGFR): Usually abnormal
    • Inflammation markers (ESR, CRP): Often elevated
    • IgG4 level: May be high if related to IgG4 disease
  2. CT or MRI Scan:

    • Shows the fibrous tissue around the aorta
    • Shows the ureters being squeezed and pulled inward (medial deviation)
    • Shows swollen kidneys (hydronephrosis)
  3. Biopsy (sometimes needed):

    • A small sample of the fibrous tissue is taken (using a needle or keyhole surgery)
    • This is checked under a microscope to rule out cancer and confirm the diagnosis
  4. PET Scan (in some cases):

    • Shows if the tissue is actively inflamed (can be treated) or just scar tissue

How is it Treated?

Treatment has two main goals: (1) relieve the blockage in the ureters to protect your kidneys, and (2) reduce the inflammation and stop the fibrosis from getting worse.

1. Relieve the Blockage (Urgent if Kidneys Failing)

  • Ureteric stent: A thin plastic tube is placed inside the ureter (through a camera in your bladder) to keep it open and allow urine to drain.
  • Nephrostomy: If a stent can't be placed, a tube is inserted directly into your kidney through your back to drain urine.

These procedures usually improve kidney function within days.

2. Steroid Medication (First-Line Treatment)

  • Prednisolone tablets (40-60 mg per day) for 4-6 weeks, then slowly reduced over 6-12 months
  • How it works: Reduces inflammation and stops the fibrosis from spreading
  • Success rate: About 85-90% of people improve with steroids
  • Side effects: Weight gain, high blood sugar, high blood pressure, weak bones, increased infection risk (your doctor will give you bone protection tablets and monitor you closely)

3. Other Medications (If Steroids Don't Work or Cause Side Effects)

  • Tamoxifen: An anti-fibrosis drug (20 mg twice daily). Often used alongside steroids or if you can't tolerate steroids.
  • Other immune-suppressing drugs: Mycophenolate, azathioprine, methotrexate
  • Rituximab: A strong immune drug given by drip, used for IgG4-related disease that doesn't respond to other treatments

4. Surgery (Ureterolysis)

If medication doesn't work or the blockage keeps coming back, you may need an operation to free the ureters from the scar tissue.

  • Procedure: The surgeon cuts away the fibrous tissue around the ureters and wraps them in a protective layer (omentum, a fatty tissue from your abdomen) to stop them getting stuck again.
  • Success rate: About 80-90% of people have long-term improvement.
  • Approach: Can be done as open surgery or keyhole (laparoscopic) surgery.

What is the Outlook?

  • With early treatment, most people do very well. Kidney function stabilises or improves, and the fibrosis stops progressing.
  • Response to steroids is usually seen within a few weeks (blood tests improve, pain reduces).
  • Long-term monitoring is essential because the condition can come back in 20-50% of people when steroids are reduced. You'll need regular blood tests and scans for several years.
  • Kidney function: If the ureters are unblocked early, kidney function usually recovers. If the blockage has been there for months, some kidney damage may be permanent.
  • Life expectancy: With treatment, life expectancy is normal. The main risk is untreated kidney failure.

Important Points to Remember

RPF is treatable. Most people respond well to steroids.

Early diagnosis matters. The sooner the ureters are unblocked, the better the kidney function recovery.

You'll need long-term follow-up. Blood tests, scans, and monitoring for relapse are crucial.

If you're on steroids long-term, you'll need bone protection (calcium, vitamin D, bisphosphonates) and stomach protection (PPI).

If you have a ureteric stent, it needs changing every 3-6 months to prevent blockage and infection.

It's not cancer. RPF is a benign (non-cancerous) condition, though we always check to make sure it's not caused by cancer.


13. References

Primary Sources

  1. Vaglio A, Salvarani C, Buzio C. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. Lancet. 2006;367(9506):241-251. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68019-0. PMID: 16427492.

  2. Cronin CG, Lohan DG, Blake MA, et al. Retroperitoneal fibrosis: a review of clinical features and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):423-431. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3629. PMID: 18647910.

  3. van Bommel EF, Jansen I, Hendriksz TR, Aarnoudse AL. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: prospective evaluation of incidence and clinicoradiologic presentation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2009;88(4):193-201. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e3181afc420. PMID: 19593223.

  4. Scheel PJ Jr, Feeley N. Retroperitoneal fibrosis: the clinical, laboratory, and radiographic presentation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2009;88(4):202-207. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e3181afc439. PMID: 19593224.

  5. Fry AC, Singh S, Gunda SS, et al. Successful use of steroids and ureteric stents in 24 patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a retrospective study. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;108(3):c213-c220. doi:10.1159/000124483. PMID: 18287807.

  6. Kermani TA, Crowson CS, Achenbach SJ, Luthra HS. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a retrospective review of clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(4):297-303. doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0663. PMID: 21454731.

  7. Stone JH, Zen Y, Deshpande V. IgG4-related disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(6):539-551. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1104650. PMID: 22316447.

  8. Kamisawa T, Zen Y, Pillai S, Stone JH. IgG4-related disease. Lancet. 2015;385(9976):1460-1471. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60720-0. PMID: 25481618.

  9. Scheel PJ Jr, Feeley N, Sozio SM. Combined prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil treatment for retroperitoneal fibrosis: a case series. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(1):31-36. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00005. PMID: 21200036.

  10. van Bommel EF, Siemes C, Hak LE, van der Veer SJ, Hendriksz TR. Long-term renal and patient outcome in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis treated with prednisone. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49(5):615-625. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.268. PMID: 17472843.

  11. Alberici F, Palmisano A, Urban ML, et al. Methotrexate plus prednisone in patients with relapsing idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(9):1584-1586. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203267. PMID: 23696631.

  12. Palmisano A, Vaglio A. Chronic periaortitis: a fibro-inflammatory disorder. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2009;23(3):339-353. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2009.03.001. PMID: 19508942.

  13. Khosroshahi A, Carruthers MN, Stone JH, et al. Rethinking Ormond's disease: "idiopathic" retroperitoneal fibrosis in the era of IgG4-related disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2013;92(2):82-91. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e318289610f. PMID: 23429355.

  14. Maritati F, Corradi D, Versari A, et al. Rituximab therapy for chronic periaortitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(7):1262-1264. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201166. PMID: 22625849.

  15. Graham JR, Suby HI, LeCompte PR, Sadowsky NL. Fibrotic disorders associated with methysergide therapy for headache. N Engl J Med. 1966;274(7):359-368. doi:10.1056/NEJM196602172740701. PMID: 5322795.

  16. Koep L, Zuidema GD. The clinical significance of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Surgery. 1977;81(3):250-257. PMID: 841463.

  17. Mitchinson MJ. The pathology of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Clin Pathol. 1970;23(8):681-689. doi:10.1136/jcp.23.8.681. PMID: 5488040.

  18. Parums DV, Chadwick DR, Mitchinson MJ. The localisation of immunoglobulin in chronic periaortitis. Atherosclerosis. 1986;61(2):117-123. doi:10.1016/0021-9150(86)90072-2. PMID: 3527880.

  19. Salvarani C, Pipitone N, Versari A, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET): evaluation of chronic periaortitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(2):298-303. doi:10.1002/art.21143. PMID: 15818656.

  20. Zen Y, Onodera M, Inoue D, et al. Retroperitoneal fibrosis: a clinicopathologic study with respect to immunoglobulin G4. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(12):1833-1839. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181b72882. PMID: 19950407.

  21. Moroni G, Gallelli B, Banfi G, et al. Long-term outcome of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis treated with surgical and/or medical approaches. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(9):2485-2490. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl246. PMID: 16735383.

  22. Runowska M, Majewski D, Puszczewicz M. Retroperitoneal fibrosis - the state-of-the-art. Reumatologia. 2016;54(5):256-263. doi:10.5114/reum.2016.63665. PMID: 27994268.

  23. Adler S, Lodermeyer S, Gaa J, Heemann U. Successful mycophenolate mofetil therapy in nine patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(9):1535-1538. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken313. PMID: 18676501.

  24. Carruthers MN, Topazian MD, Khosroshahi A, et al. Rituximab for IgG4-related disease: a prospective, open-label trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(6):1171-1177. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206605. PMID: 25667206.

  25. Ilie CP, Pemberton RJ, Tolley DA. Prospective study of outcome of laparoscopic ureterolysis in patients with chronic idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Endourol. 2010;24(7):1197-1202. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0666. PMID: 20578897.

  26. Fugita OE, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Endourol. 2002;16(8):571-574. doi:10.1089/089277902320913234. PMID: 12470463.

  27. Khosroshahi A, Wallace ZS, Crowe JL, et al. International Consensus Guidance Statement on the Management and Treatment of IgG4-Related Disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1688-1699. doi:10.1002/art.39132. PMID: 25809420.


Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference only. Clinical decisions should be individualised to patient circumstances and made in consultation with appropriate specialists. This content does not replace clinical judgement or formal medical advice.

Evidence trail

This article contains inline citation markers, but the full bibliography has not yet been imported as a visible references section. The page is still tracked through the editorial review pipeline below.

Tracked citations
Inline citations present
Reviewed by
MedVellum Editorial Team
Review date
17 Jan 2026

All clinical claims sourced from PubMed

Learning map

Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.

Prerequisites

Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.

Differentials

Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.

Consequences

Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.

  • End-Stage Renal Disease
  • Hydronephrosis
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis